Minnesota lake · tribal assessment record

Big Lake

Assessment decisions reported by Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota (Fond du Lac Band) to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2024 reporting cycle.

550
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
Mesotrophic
Reported trophic class
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Big Lake, a lake in Minnesota, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band)'s most recent Integrated Report cycle (2024). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 10% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) rules aquatic life fully supporting, and aquatic life: subsistence fishing (netting) not supported.

Not Supporting
overall status
P91
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic-life or related

Assessment verdicts are the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band)'s decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

B-
Water Quality Standing
67/100
Big Lake

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationA+
Meeting criteria
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2024
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Big Lake against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: assessed size

The number that most separates Big Lake nationally is assessed size: 550.1 acres, larger than 91% of the 38,628 lake-type units with an area on file.

The uses disagree

This record splits: Not Supporting on aquatic life, Fully Supporting on recreation. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Big Lake is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Typical cause-list length

1 listed cause is a middle-tercile list length among assessed lake-type units. Look to IR category and use outcomes for the distinctive reading.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Minnesota carries 13,176 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Big Lake without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2024
Monitored through 2024 · Minnesota Integrated Report
Listing category
Not categorized
No EPA Integrated Report category reported
Uses with verdicts
5
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band)'s definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. The latest monitoring the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) filed against this record runs through 2024. For the definitive verdicts on this record, the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them.

Designated use Group Verdict
Aquatic Life: Subsistence Fishing (Netting) Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Aquatic Life: Warm Water Fisheries Aquatic-life or related Fully Supporting
Recreation: Primary Contact Recreational Recreation Fully Supporting
Recreation: Secondary Contact Recreational Recreation Fully Supporting
Wildlife Other Fully Supporting

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Mercury Aquatic Life: Subsistence Fishing (Netting) Also assessed as meeting: Wildlife 2016 TMDL priority: High

Reading the record

Cleanup queue for Big Lake

1 listed cause ranked High in the TMDL queue, still without a plan

The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) ranked Mercury high in its TMDL development queue, and no cleanup plan is on file for that listing yet. That queue rank is the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band)'s own scheduling signal, not an EPA national rule.

A High ranking names a position in the state's plan-writing queue; it is not a measure of how impaired the water is. How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

Big Lake is one of 13,176 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Minnesota, and one of 1,939 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 550 assessed acres it ranks 3,490th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 3,489 lakes with a larger one.

Still unfiled

The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Mesotrophic is the trophic class the filing agency reported to EPA ATTAINS for this assessment unit. It describes nutrient enrichment, not whether the water is safe, and it is not a PlainLakes inference. What the trophic scale measures.

Why no water-level record

Big Lake has no daily USGS water-level or reservoir-storage series on this page because NWIS lists a lake monitoring site named for the waterbody, but the site is not active, and PlainLakes ingests only the active inventory, so there is no series to attach. How PlainLakes links gauges.

In context

Where Big Lake sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

550 Top 9% larger than 91% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Big Lake. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Minnesota context

ATTAINS carries 13,176 lake-type waterbodies in Minnesota, 1,798 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 1,566 fully supporting. Among the 1,939 indexed units there, Big Lake ranks 708th by listed-cause count (one listed cause) and 487th by assessed size among the 1,930 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (1,798 statewide) . Its listed causes (Mercury) sit outside Minnesota's top-five list, which is led by Mercury in Fish Tissue.

Other large assessed lakes in Minnesota Assessed acres
Superior Not Supporting 13,182,720
Lake of the Woods Not Supporting 301,348
Red (Lower Red) Not reported 164,699
Lower Red Lake Fully Supporting 164,689
Mille Lacs Not Supporting 128,076
Red (Upper Red) Not Supporting 119,279

Peers near Big Lake's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (550 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (Fond du Lac Band)'s reported decisions for assessment unit FDL_102. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.