California reservoir · state assessment record

Bridgeport Reservoir

Assessment decisions reported by California to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle.

2,557
Assessed acres
Lake / Reservoir / Pond
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Bridgeport Reservoir, a reservoir in California, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 5% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes).

Not Supporting
overall status
P97
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

A+
Water Quality Standing
95/100
Bridgeport Reservoir

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeN/A
Not assessed
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2026
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

How Bridgeport Reservoir reads against the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: assessed size

The number that most separates Bridgeport Reservoir nationally is assessed size: 2,557 acres, larger than 97% of the 38,628 lake-type units with an area on file.

Bridgeport Reservoir: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Bridgeport Reservoir. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Bridgeport Reservoir is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Typical cause-list length

1 listed cause is a middle-tercile list length among assessed lake-type units. Look to IR category and use outcomes for the distinctive reading.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, California carries 607 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Bridgeport Reservoir without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Limited-coverage record. The reported record for this reservoir currently lacks a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive recreation verdict, a definitive aquatic-life verdict, among other dimensions. It is shown for completeness; the richer records for California are on the state page.
Reporting cycle
2026
California Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
1
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle.

Designated use Group Verdict
Wildlife Habitat Other Not Supporting
Commercial and Sport Fishing Fish-consumption or fishery Insufficient Information

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Mercury Wildlife Habitat Also assessed as meeting: Commercial and Sport Fishing 2010 TMDL priority: Medium

Probable sources

California listed the source of the impairment as unknown. That is the state's own filed value, not a gap in this record: the cause has been identified, the origin has not.

Reading the record

Where Bridgeport Reservoir sits among peers

81% of California's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported

California ruled definitively on a single designated use at Bridgeport Reservoir and found it not supported. The dataset shows 57 California lakes judged to that same depth.

California's assessed lakes are most often judged on 2 uses; this one was judged on 1.

81 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of California lakes judged on a single designated use with the same outcome
Assessed lakes in California by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in California by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 118003
Mixed Not possible31088
None supported 46 (this record)1071172

Ringed cell: Bridgeport Reservoir. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

Bridgeport Reservoir is one of 607 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from California. It is not among the 195 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 2,557 assessed acres it ranks 1,145th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 1,144 lakes with a larger one.

Not yet on record

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive recreation verdict, and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Why no water-level record

Bridgeport Reservoir has no daily USGS water-level or reservoir-storage series on this page because NWIS lists a lake monitoring site named for the waterbody, but the site is not active, and PlainLakes ingests only the active inventory, so there is no series to attach. How PlainLakes links gauges.

In context

Where Bridgeport Reservoir sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

2,557 Top 3% larger than 97% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Bridgeport Reservoir. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

California context

ATTAINS carries 607 lake-type waterbodies in California, 202 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 22 fully supporting.

Other large assessed lakes in California Assessed acres
Salton Sea Not Supporting 233,045
Tahoe, Lake Not Supporting 84,092
Goose Lake (Modoc County) Not reported 62,385
Honey Lake Not Supporting 55,526
Klamath River HU, Tule Lake and Lower Klamath Lake National Wildlife Refuge Not Supporting 48,791
Mono Lake Not Supporting 45,299

Peers near Bridgeport Reservoir's size or cause load

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit CAL6303005019980806102128. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.