Michigan reservoir · state assessment record

C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir)

NE of Flint. Genessee Co. Assessment decisions reported by Michigan to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2024 reporting cycle.

600
Assessed acres
Reservoir
Water type
Hypereutrophic
Reported trophic class
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir), a reservoir in Michigan, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 5 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2024). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 10% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (5 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting. Fish consumption is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P92
Assessed size nationally
P1
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
16/100
C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir)

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionF
Not supporting
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
5 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2024
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

How C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) reads against the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: in-state cause rank

Inside Michigan, cause-list rank is the local separator: C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) is 18 of 776 indexed units by listed-cause count, toward the top of that state's filed lists.

Longer than most cause lists

5 listed causes puts this unit above 97% of assessed lake-type records by list length. Treat that as a coding-and-sampling signal: states that split pollutants finely mint longer lists without proving worse water.

Every filed use falls short

On the uses this filer ruled on, fish consumption, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Large assessed unit

At 600.2 acres, C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (3,289 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir): Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir). Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Michigan carries 4,307 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2024
Michigan Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
7
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Michigan filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Michigan filed its own confidence on the 7 definitive verdicts it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Agriculture Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Industrial Water Supply Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Navigation Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Other Indigenous Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Partial Body Contact Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Total Body Contact Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Cold Water Fishery Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed
Warm Water Fishery Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Escherichia coli (E. coli) Total Body Contact Recreation, Partial Body Contact Recreation 2012 TMDL approved
PCBs in Fish Tissue Fish Consumption 2020 TMDL approved
Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Fish Tissue Fish Consumption 2020 TMDL priority: Low
Eutrophication, Nutrients Other Indigenous Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2024 TMDL priority: Low
Mercury in Fish Tissue Fish Consumption 2026 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Escherichia coli (E. coli)
Agriculture (suspected) On-Site Treatment Systems (Septic Systems and Similar Decentralized Systems) (suspected) Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers (suspected) Sewage Discharges in Unsewered Areas (suspected)
PCBs in Fish Tissue
Atmospheric Deposition - Toxics (confirmed)
Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Fish Tissue
Industrial Point Source Discharge (confirmed) Discharges From Biosolids (Sludge) Storage, Application or Disposal (confirmed) Discharges From Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) (confirmed)

Michigan also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for PCBs in Fish Tissue; Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Fish Tissue; Eutrophication, Nutrients; and Mercury in Fish Tissue.

Reading the record

Where C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) sits among peers

56% of Michigan's lakes assessed this deeply also came out mixed

Michigan ruled definitively on 7 designated uses at C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) and found 4 of 7 not supported. The dataset shows 1,091 Michigan lakes judged to that same depth.

Michigan's assessed lakes are most often judged on 3 uses; this one was judged on 7.

56 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Michigan lakes judged on 7 designated uses with the same outcome
Assessed lakes in Michigan by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Michigan by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 142851.9k822481
Mixed Not possible380151610 (this record)
None supported 26000

Ringed cell: C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir). Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) is one of 4,307 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Michigan, and one of 776 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 600 assessed acres it ranks 3,290th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 3,289 lakes with a larger one.

Reported trophic class

Hypereutrophic is the trophic class the filing agency reported to EPA ATTAINS for this assessment unit. It describes nutrient enrichment, not whether the water is safe, and it is not a PlainLakes inference. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

600 Top 8% larger than 92% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

5 Longer than most more listed causes than 97% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir). Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Michigan context

ATTAINS carries 4,307 lake-type waterbodies in Michigan, 807 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 3,457 fully supporting. Among the 776 indexed units there, C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir) ranks 18th by listed-cause count (5 listed causes) and 132nd by assessed size among the 493 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (807 statewide) . Its listed causes include Escherichia coli (E. coli), PCBs in Fish Tissue, Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Fish Tissue, and Mercury in Fish Tissue, which also appear among Michigan's most-filed impairment causes (led by Mercury in Fish Tissue). It also lists Eutrophication, Nutrients, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Michigan Assessed acres
Lake Huron (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 5,815,360
Lake Michigan South of Frankfort (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 5,665,920
St. Marys River Not Supporting 129,983
Lake St. Clair (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 103,616
Lake Erie (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 71,680
Houghton Lake Not Supporting 20,066

Peers near C. S. Mott Lake (Reservoir)'s size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (600 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (5 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • The fish-consumption use is assessed as not supporting. Before eating fish from this reservoir, check your state fish-advisory program for species-specific meal limits. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MI040802040409-08. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.