Indiana lake · state assessment record

Cedarville Reservoir

Assessment decisions reported by Indiana to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2005 reporting cycle.

408
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Cedarville Reservoir, a lake in Indiana, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 3 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2005). By assessed acreage it sits in the upper quartile by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (3 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting. Indiana assesses human health and wildlife as not supported; it reported no verdict on fish consumption itself.

Not Supporting
overall status
P89
Assessed size nationally
P5
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
2/100
Cedarville Reservoir

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionF
Not supporting
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
3 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2005
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Where Cedarville Reservoir stands in the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: in-state cause rank

Inside Indiana, cause-list rank is the local separator: Cedarville Reservoir is 4 of 162 indexed units by listed-cause count, toward the top of that state's filed lists.

Every ruled-on use is not supporting

On the uses this filer ruled on, fish consumption, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Longer than most cause lists

3 listed causes puts this unit above 90% of assessed lake-type records by list length. Treat that as a coding-and-sampling signal: states that split pollutants finely mint longer lists without proving worse water.

Cedarville Reservoir: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Cedarville Reservoir. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Large assessed unit

At 408 acres, Cedarville Reservoir clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (4,280 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Indiana carries 1,588 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Cedarville Reservoir without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2005
Indiana Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Indiana filed its own confidence on the one definitive verdict it rated: Excellent. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Full Body Contact Recreation Not Supporting
Human Health and Wildlife Fish-consumption or fishery Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Excellent
Warm Water Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Escherichia coli (E. coli) Full Body Contact 2002 TMDL priority: Medium
PCBs in Fish Tissue Human Health and Wildlife 2002 TMDL priority: Low
Algae Warm Water Aquatic Life 2018 TMDL priority: Medium

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Escherichia coli (E. coli)
Non-Point Source (suspected)

Indiana also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for PCBs in Fish Tissue.

Reading the record

Where Cedarville Reservoir sits among peers

3 of 16 Indiana lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported

Indiana ruled definitively on 3 designated uses at Cedarville Reservoir and found none of them supported. The dataset shows 16 Indiana lakes judged to that same depth.

Indiana's assessed lakes are most often judged on 1 use; this one was judged on 3.

Assessed lakes in Indiana by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Indiana by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 7916100
Mixed Not possible381250
None supported 72153 (this record)00

Ringed cell: Cedarville Reservoir. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

Cedarville Reservoir is one of 1,588 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Indiana, and one of 162 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 408 assessed acres it ranks 4,281st by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 4,280 lakes with a larger one.

In context

Where Cedarville Reservoir sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

408 Top 11% larger than 89% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

3 Longer than most more listed causes than 90% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Cedarville Reservoir. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Indiana context

ATTAINS carries 1,588 lake-type waterbodies in Indiana, 145 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 96 fully supporting. Among the 162 indexed units there, Cedarville Reservoir ranks 4th by listed-cause count (3 listed causes) and 35th by assessed size among the 156 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (145 statewide) . Its listed causes include Escherichia coli (E. coli) and PCBs in Fish Tissue, which also appear among Indiana's most-filed impairment causes (led by PCBs in Fish Tissue). It also lists Algae, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Indiana Assessed acres
Lake Michigan (Not Indexed) (Salmonid) (Osrw) Not Supporting 154,176
Patoka Reservoir (Pws) Fully Supporting 8,880
Monroe Reservoir (Lower) (Pws) Not Supporting 6,863
Brookville Reservoir Not Supporting 5,260
Monroe Reservoir (Upper) (Pws) Not Supporting 3,887
Wawasee, Lake Not Supporting 3,410

Peers near Cedarville Reservoir's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (408 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (3 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • The listing here is on a fishery use, not on fish consumption, and this state reported no consumption verdict for this lake. Your state fish-advisory program is the source for whether the catch is safe to eat. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit INA03P1024_00. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.