Connecticut lake · state assessment record

Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford)

Assessment decisions reported by Connecticut to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2014 reporting cycle.

386
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford), a lake in Connecticut, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2014). By assessed acreage it sits in the upper quartile by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as fully supporting. Fish consumption is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P89
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list
Fully Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

B
Water Quality Standing
70/100
Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford)

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationA+
Meeting criteria
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeA+
Meeting criteria
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionF
Not supporting
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2014
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Reading Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford)'s filed record

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: assessed size

The number that most separates Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) nationally is assessed size: 385.8 acres, larger than 89% of the 38,628 lake-type units with an area on file.

Not one verdict, several

This record splits: Not Supporting on fish consumption, Fully Supporting on recreation, aquatic life. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford): Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford). Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Typical cause-list length

1 listed cause is a middle-tercile list length among assessed lake-type units. Look to IR category and use outcomes for the distinctive reading.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Connecticut carries 182 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2014
Connecticut Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
4
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Connecticut filed its own confidence on the 4 definitive verdicts it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Existing or Proposed Drinking Water Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Mercury Fish Consumption 1996 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Mercury
Atmospheric Deposition - Toxics (suspected)

Reading the record

Where Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) sits among peers

1 of 1 Connecticut lakes assessed this deeply also came out mixed (every lake judged to this depth, so the outcome does not set this record apart)

Connecticut ruled definitively on 4 designated uses at Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) and found 1 of 4 not supported. The dataset shows 1 Connecticut lakes judged to that same depth.

Connecticut's assessed lakes are most often judged on 2 uses; this one was judged on 4.

Assessed lakes in Connecticut by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Connecticut by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 4253000
Mixed Not possible1151 (this record)0
None supported 1610100

Ringed cell: Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford). Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) is one of 182 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Connecticut, and one of 97 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 386 assessed acres it ranks 4,463rd by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 4,462 lakes with a larger one.

In context

Where Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

386 Top 11% larger than 89% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford). Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Connecticut context

ATTAINS carries 182 lake-type waterbodies in Connecticut, 44 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 95 fully supporting. Among the 97 indexed units there, Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford) ranks 32nd by listed-cause count (one listed cause) and 14th by assessed size among the 97 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (44 statewide) . Its listed causes (Mercury) sit outside Connecticut's top-five list, which is led by Algae.

Other large assessed lakes in Connecticut Assessed acres
Candlewood, Lake (New Fairfield/Danbury/Sherman/New Milford) Fully Supporting 5,086
Lillinonah, Lake (Newtown/Southbury/Bridgewater/Brookfield) Not Supporting 1,595
Bantam Lake (Litchfield/Morris) Not Supporting 955
Colebrook River (Reservoir) Lake (Colebrook) Not Assessed 852
Pachaug Pond (Griswold) Fully Supporting 837
Saugatuck Reservoir (Weston/Easton/Redding) Fully Supporting 823

Peers near Compensating Res. (L. McDonough) (Barkhamsted/New Hartford)'s size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (386 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • The fish-consumption use is assessed as not supporting. Before eating fish from this lake, check your state fish-advisory program for species-specific meal limits. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit CT4308-00-1-L2_01. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.