Louisiana lake · state assessment record

Crew Lake

Assessment decisions reported by Louisiana to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle.

81
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Crew Lake, a lake in Louisiana, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 4 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (4 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P66
Assessed size nationally
P3
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
21/100
Crew Lake

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
4 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2026
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Crew Lake against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 4 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 95% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

No ruled-on use clears the bar

On the uses this filer ruled on, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Crew Lake: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Crew Lake. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Small within Louisiana

State size rank 69 of 74 puts Crew Lake toward the small end of Louisiana's indexed lake-type units with an area.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Crew Lake is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Louisiana carries 76 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Crew Lake without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2026
Monitored through 2021 · Louisiana Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. The latest monitoring Louisiana filed against this record runs through 2021. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Louisiana filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Louisiana filed its own confidence on the 3 definitive verdicts it rated: Fair. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fish and Wildlife Propagation Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Fair
Primary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Fair
Secondary Contact Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Fair

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Dissolved Oxygen Fish and Wildlife Propagation 2000 TMDL approved
Fecal Coliform Primary Contact Recreation 2002 TMDL priority: Low
Turbidity Fish and Wildlife Propagation 2006 TMDL priority: Low
Phosphorus, Total Fish and Wildlife Propagation 2026 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Dissolved Oxygen
Agriculture (suspected)
Fecal Coliform
On-Site Treatment Systems (Septic Systems and Similar Decentralized Systems) (suspected)
Turbidity
Agriculture (suspected)
Phosphorus, Total
Anthropogenic Land Use Changes (suspected)

Reading the record

How current is Crew Lake's evidence?

5 years between the 2026 reporting cycle and monitoring through 2021

The latest monitoring Louisiana filed against this record runs through 2021. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Louisiana filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them.

The cycle is when the state reported; the monitoring year, where filed, is when it measured. How to read assessment currency.

Scale and rank

Crew Lake is one of 76 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Louisiana, and one of 74 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 81 assessed acres it ranks 13,373rd by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 13,372 lakes with a larger one.

Not yet on record

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Louisiana carried the trophic field for this assessment unit and filed it as unclassified, which records that no class was determined rather than that the water is unenriched. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where Crew Lake sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

81 Top 34% larger than 66% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

4 Longer than most more listed causes than 95% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Crew Lake. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Louisiana context

ATTAINS carries 76 lake-type waterbodies in Louisiana, 64 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 11 fully supporting. Among the 74 indexed units there, Crew Lake ranks 8th by listed-cause count (4 listed causes) and 69th by assessed size among the 74 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (64 statewide) . Its listed causes include Dissolved Oxygen and Turbidity, which also appear among Louisiana's most-filed impairment causes (led by Mercury - Fish Consumption Advisory). It also lists Fecal Coliform; and Phosphorus, Total, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Louisiana Assessed acres
Toledo Bend Reservoir-From Texas-Louisiana state line to Toledo Bend Dam Not Supporting 165,487
White Lake Not Supporting 56,487
Lake Salvador Not Supporting 49,477
Grand Lake Not Supporting 47,869
Lac Des Allemands Not Supporting 16,596
Catahoula Lake Not Supporting 16,509

Peers near Crew Lake's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (81 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (4 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit LA080909_00. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.