Massachusetts lake · state assessment record

Forge Pond (72 acres)

Assessment decisions reported by Massachusetts to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2020 reporting cycle.

72
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Forge Pond, a lake in Massachusetts, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 2 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2020). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (2 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P63
Assessed size nationally
P10
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
13/100
Forge Pond

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
2 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2020
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Forge Pond against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 2 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 80% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

No ruled-on use clears the bar

On the uses this filer ruled on, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Forge Pond: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Forge Pond. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Forge Pond is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Mid-pack inside Massachusetts

Size rank 239 of 678 inside Massachusetts is mid-pack; the national percentile is the better scale comparison for this unit.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Massachusetts carries 1,191 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Forge Pond without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2020
Massachusetts Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
4
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Massachusetts filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Massachusetts filed its own confidence on the 3 definitive verdicts it rated: Low. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Aesthetic Other Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Low
Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Primary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Low
Secondary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Low
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Aesthetic; Primary Contact Recreation; Secondary Contact Recreation; Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 1992 TMDL priority: Low
Water Chestnut Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2020 None reported

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Water Chestnut
Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)

Massachusetts also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators.

Reading the record

Where Forge Pond sits among peers

81% of Massachusetts's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported

Massachusetts ruled definitively on 4 designated uses at Forge Pond and found none of them supported. The dataset shows 159 Massachusetts lakes judged to that same depth.

Massachusetts's assessed lakes are most often judged on 1 use; this one was judged on 4.

81 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Massachusetts lakes judged on 4 designated uses with the same outcome
Assessed lakes in Massachusetts by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Massachusetts by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 15141100
Mixed Not possible5193112
None supported 2836091128 (this record)49

Ringed cell: Forge Pond. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

Forge Pond is one of 1,191 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Massachusetts, and one of 678 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 72 assessed acres it ranks 14,387th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 14,386 lakes with a larger one.

Still unfiled

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Forge Pond sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

72 Top 37% larger than 63% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

2 Longer than most more listed causes than 80% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Forge Pond. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Massachusetts context

ATTAINS carries 1,191 lake-type waterbodies in Massachusetts, 678 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 40 fully supporting. Among the 678 indexed units there, Forge Pond ranks 281st by listed-cause count (2 listed causes) and 239th by assessed size among the 678 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (678 statewide) . Its listed causes (Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators; and Water Chestnut) sit outside Massachusetts's top-five list, which is led by Mercury in Fish Tissue.

Other large assessed lakes in Massachusetts Assessed acres
Quabbin Reservoir Not Supporting 24,010
Wachusett Reservoir Not Supporting 3,962
Assawompset Pond Not Assessed 2,034
North Watuppa Pond Not Supporting 1,728
Long Pond Not Supporting 1,728
South Watuppa Pond Not Supporting 1,473

Peers near Forge Pond's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (72 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (2 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MA34024. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.