Massachusetts lake · state assessment record
Grove Pond
Assessment decisions reported by Massachusetts to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle, a cycle that is open for public comment.
- 68
- Assessed acres
- Lake, Freshwater
- Water type
This waterbody in one line
Grove Pond, a lake in Massachusetts, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 10 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026), a cycle that is open for public comment. By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (10 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting. Fish consumption is assessed as not supporting.
- Not Supporting
- overall status
- P62
- Assessed size nationally
- P0
- Shorter cause list
- Not Supporting
- aquatic life
Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.
A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.
How Grove Pond reads against the filed register
Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.
The signature stat: cause-list length
The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 10 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 100% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.
Every ruled-on use is not supporting
On the uses this filer ruled on, fish consumption, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.
Grove Pond: Category 5, TMDL still owed
Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Grove Pond. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.
Overall status: not supporting
The filer's overall status for Grove Pond is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.
Mid-pack inside Massachusetts
Size rank 247 of 678 inside Massachusetts is mid-pack; the national percentile is the better scale comparison for this unit.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Massachusetts carries 1,191 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Grove Pond without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.
The record
Designated-use assessments
Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Massachusetts filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them.
| Designated use | Group | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Aesthetic | Other | Not Supporting |
| Fish Consumption | Fish-consumption or fishery | Not Supporting |
| Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife | Aquatic-life or related | Not Supporting |
| Primary Contact Recreation | Recreation | Not Supporting |
| Secondary Contact Recreation | Recreation | Not Supporting |
The record
Listed impairment causes
Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.
| Cause | Affected uses | First listed | Cleanup standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dehp (Di-Sec-Octyl Phthalate) | Primary Contact Recreation, Secondary Contact Recreation | 1996 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Arsenic | Primary Contact Recreation, Secondary Contact Recreation | 1998 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Mercury in Fish Tissue | Fish Consumption | 1998 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Aquatic Plants (Macrophytes) | Aesthetic, Primary Contact Recreation, Secondary Contact Recreation | 2002 | None reported |
| Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Aquatic Ecosystems) | Primary Contact Recreation, Secondary Contact Recreation | 2010 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Curly-Leaf Pondweed | Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife | 2020 | None reported |
| Fanwort | Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife | 2020 | None reported |
| Non-Native Aquatic Plants | Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife | 2020 | None reported |
| Sediment Bioassay | Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife | 2020 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators | Aesthetic, Primary Contact Recreation, Secondary Contact Recreation | 2026 | TMDL priority: Low |
Probable sources named by the state
Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.
- Dehp (Di-Sec-Octyl Phthalate)
- Contaminated Groundwater (confirmed) Contaminated Sediments (confirmed)
- Arsenic
- Contaminated Groundwater (confirmed) Contaminated Sediments (confirmed)
- Mercury in Fish Tissue
- Atmospheric Deposition (confirmed)
- Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Aquatic Ecosystems)
- Contaminated Groundwater (confirmed) Contaminated Sediments (confirmed)
- Curly-Leaf Pondweed
- Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
- Fanwort
- Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
- Non-Native Aquatic Plants
- Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
- Sediment Bioassay
- Contaminated Groundwater (confirmed) Contaminated Sediments (confirmed)
- Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators
- Discharges From Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) (suspected)
Massachusetts also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Dehp (Di-Sec-Octyl Phthalate); Arsenic; Mercury in Fish Tissue; Aquatic Plants (Macrophytes); Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Aquatic Ecosystems); Sediment Bioassay; and Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators.
Reading the record
Where Grove Pond sits among peers
80% of Massachusetts's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported
Massachusetts ruled definitively on 5 designated uses at Grove Pond and found none of them supported. The dataset shows 61 Massachusetts lakes judged to that same depth.
Massachusetts's assessed lakes are most often judged on 1 use; this one was judged on 5.
Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All supported | 15 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Mixed | Not possible | 5 | 19 | 31 | 12 |
| None supported | 283 | 60 | 91 | 128 | 49 (this record) |
Ringed cell: Grove Pond. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.
Scale and rank
Grove Pond is one of 1,191 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Massachusetts, and one of 678 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 68 assessed acres it ranks 14,847th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 14,846 lakes with a larger one.
In context
Where Grove Pond sits nationally
Assessed size among U.S. lakes
Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once
68 Top 38% larger than 62% of 38,628 lakes
lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value
Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026
Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict
How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry
10 Longer than most more listed causes than 99%+ of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict
named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value
Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026
In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Grove Pond. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.
In context
Massachusetts context
ATTAINS carries 1,191 lake-type waterbodies in Massachusetts, 678 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 40 fully supporting. Among the 678 indexed units there, Grove Pond ranks 2nd by listed-cause count (10 listed causes) and 247th by assessed size among the 678 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (678 statewide) . Its listed causes include Mercury in Fish Tissue, Aquatic Plants (Macrophytes), Fanwort, and Non-Native Aquatic Plants, which also appear among Massachusetts's most-filed impairment causes (led by Mercury in Fish Tissue). It also lists Dehp (Di-Sec-Octyl Phthalate); Arsenic; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Aquatic Ecosystems); Curly-Leaf Pondweed; Sediment Bioassay; and Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators, outside that top-five list.
| Other large assessed lakes in Massachusetts | Assessed acres |
|---|---|
| Quabbin Reservoir Not Supporting | 24,010 |
| Wachusett Reservoir Not Supporting | 3,962 |
| Assawompset Pond Not Assessed | 2,034 |
| North Watuppa Pond Not Supporting | 1,728 |
| Long Pond Not Supporting | 1,728 |
| South Watuppa Pond Not Supporting | 1,473 |
Peers near Grove Pond's size or cause load
Similar assessed acres
Nearest filed extents (68 acres here).
- Big Ditch Lake · 68 acres · WV
- Chandler · 68 acres · VT
- Clarks Millpond · 68 acres · WI
- Dunns · 68 acres · IL
Similar cause load
Nearest listed-cause counts (10 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.
- Brownlee Reservoir · 10 causes · OR
- Campus · 10 causes · IL
- Cooper River (above Evesham Road) · 10 causes · NJ
- Fox · 10 causes · IL
What to do with this record
- The fish-consumption use is assessed as not supporting. Before eating fish from this lake, check your state fish-advisory program for species-specific meal limits. Consumption status guide
- Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained
PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.
Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MA81053. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.