Alaska lake · state assessment record

Harding Lake

Assessment decisions reported by Alaska to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2012 reporting cycle.

2,659
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Harding Lake, a lake in Alaska, is assessed as fully supporting its designated uses, with no impairment causes listed in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2012). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 5% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is shorter than on half of assessed lakes (0 listed causes).

Fully Supporting
overall status
P97
Assessed size nationally
P51
Shorter cause list

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

B-
Water Quality Standing
68/100
Harding Lake

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeN/A
Not assessed
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
0 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes on this record
Assessment CurrencyF
2012
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

How Harding Lake reads against the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is a short cause list: 0 causes, shorter than 51% of assessed lake-type units. A short list can mean a focused impairment, or a shallow assessment.

Large assessed unit

At 2,659 acres, Harding Lake clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (1,099 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

IR category in the supporting band

EPA's Integrated Report category for Harding Lake is 2. In ATTAINS that band means the assessed uses are supporting (or supporting with other waters in the unit), so the narrative weight shifts to how deep the assessment went and whether monitoring is current, not to a restoration plan.

Overall status: fully supporting

Overall status is Fully Supporting. If an IR category or cause row still appears, it usually reflects a prior listing path or a use the overall rollup does not collapse, read those sections rather than stopping at the tile.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Alaska carries 77 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Harding Lake without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Limited-coverage record. The reported record for this lake currently lacks a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive recreation verdict, a definitive aquatic-life verdict, among other dimensions. It is shown for completeness; the richer records for Alaska are on the state page.
Reporting cycle
2012
Alaska Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 2
Uses with verdicts
1
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Alaska filed its own confidence on the one definitive verdict it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fresh Water / Water Supply / Drinking, Culinary, and Food Processing Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Growth and Propagation of Fish, Shellfish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Water Recreation / Contact Recreation Recreation Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Water Recreation / Secondary Recreation Recreation Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Water Supply / Agriculture, Including Irrigation and Stock Watering Other Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Water Supply / Aquaculture Other Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good
Fresh Water / Water Supply / Industrial Other Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good

The record

Listed impairment causes

The state's reported assessment lists no impairment causes for this lake.

Reading the record

Harding Lake: Category 2 reading

2 Category 2: some uses supported, others not assessed

Alaska filed this assessment unit as Category 2: some designated uses are supported and others were not assessed in this cycle. Absence of a failing verdict is not the same as a full Category 1 finding.

How these categories work.

Scale and rank

Harding Lake is one of 77 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Alaska. It is not among the 12 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 2,659 assessed acres it ranks 1,100th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 1,099 lakes with a larger one.

What this record holds

Alaska completed an assessment here and listed no impairment cause, so the record holds a verdict and its supporting use rows but no pollutant to track over time. The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive recreation verdict, and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Alaska carried the trophic field for this assessment unit and filed it as unclassified, which records that no class was determined rather than that the water is unenriched. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where Harding Lake sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

2,659 Top 3% larger than 97% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

0 Among the shortest cause lists fewer listed causes than 51% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Harding Lake. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Alaska context

ATTAINS carries 77 lake-type waterbodies in Alaska, 7 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 9 fully supporting.

Other large assessed lakes in Alaska Assessed acres
Iliamna Lake Not Assessed 960,000
Kenai Lake Not Assessed 57,618
Whitefish Lake Not Assessed 18,726
Lower Fire Lake Not Assessed 4,480
Redoubt Lake Not Assessed 3,209
Nancy Lake Not Assessed 2,240

Peers near Harding Lake's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (2,659 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (0 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit AK_L_8030508_001. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.