Illinois lake · state assessment record

Honey

Assessment decisions reported by Illinois to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2018 reporting cycle.

66
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
Eutrophic
Reported trophic class
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Honey, a lake in Illinois, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 2 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2018). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (2 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as fully supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P61
Assessed size nationally
P10
Shorter cause list
Fully Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
39/100
Honey

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeA+
Meeting criteria
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
2 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2018
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Where Honey stands in the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 2 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 80% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

A split ruling across uses

This record splits: Not Supporting on recreation, Fully Supporting on aquatic life. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Honey: Category 4A reading

Category 4A means a TMDL (or equivalent) is already approved for the impairment on Honey. The remaining work is implementation and tracking, read the cleanup-standing and cause rows for what the state already committed to address.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Honey is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Mid-pack assessed size

66 acres lands in the middle tercile of units with an area filed. Acreage is not what distinguishes this record from its peers.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Illinois carries 783 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Honey without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2018
Monitored through 2015 · Illinois Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 4A
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Monitoring behind at least one of these designated-use verdicts ran through 2015, as Illinois filed it. Illinois filed its own confidence on the 3 definitive verdicts it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Aesthetic Quality Other Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Primary Contact Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Phosphorus, Total Aesthetic Quality 2004 TMDL approved
Fecal Coliform Primary Contact 2006 TMDL approved

Reading the record

Honey: Category 4A reading

4A Category 4A: impaired, TMDL completed

Illinois filed this assessment unit as Category 4A: impaired, with a pollutant-budget TMDL already completed under 303(d). The listing remains an impairment finding; the plan is on file rather than still awaiting write-up.

How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

Honey is one of 783 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Illinois, and one of 439 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 66 assessed acres it ranks 15,101st by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 15,100 lakes with a larger one.

Awaiting a filing

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Eutrophic is the trophic class the filing agency reported to EPA ATTAINS for this assessment unit. It describes nutrient enrichment, not whether the water is safe, and it is not a PlainLakes inference. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where Honey sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

66 Top 39% larger than 61% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

2 Longer than most more listed causes than 80% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Honey. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Illinois context

ATTAINS carries 783 lake-type waterbodies in Illinois, 434 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 63 fully supporting. Among the 439 indexed units there, Honey ranks 251st by listed-cause count (2 listed causes) and 179th by assessed size among the 388 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (434 statewide) . Its listed causes include Phosphorus, Total, which also appears among Illinois's most-filed impairment causes (led by Phosphorus, Total). It also lists Fecal Coliform, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Illinois Assessed acres
Lake Michigan Nearshore Not Supporting 125,440
Carlyle Not Supporting 24,580
Rend Not Supporting 18,900
Shelbyville Not Supporting 11,000
Crab Orchard Not Supporting 6,965
Clinton Not Supporting 4,895

Peers near Honey's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (66 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (2 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit IL_RTZU. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.