Connecticut lake · state assessment record

Kenosia, Lake (Danbury)

Assessment decisions reported by Connecticut to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2014 reporting cycle.

57
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Kenosia, Lake (Danbury), a lake in Connecticut, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 6 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2014). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (6 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as fully supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P58
Assessed size nationally
P1
Shorter cause list
Fully Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

D
Water Quality Standing
43/100
Kenosia, Lake (Danbury)

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeA+
Meeting criteria
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
6 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2014
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

How Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) reads against the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 6 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 99% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

A split ruling across uses

This record splits: Not Supporting on recreation, Fully Supporting on aquatic life. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Kenosia, Lake (Danbury): Category 4A reading

Category 4A means a TMDL (or equivalent) is already approved for the impairment on Kenosia, Lake (Danbury). The remaining work is implementation and tracking, read the cleanup-standing and cause rows for what the state already committed to address.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Small within Connecticut

State size rank 72 of 97 puts Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) toward the small end of Connecticut's indexed lake-type units with an area.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Connecticut carries 182 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2014
Connecticut Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 4A
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Connecticut filed its own confidence on the 3 definitive verdicts it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Existing or Proposed Drinking Water Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good on other public health indicators; Excellent on physical/chemical

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Algae Recreation 1996 TMDL approved
Chlorophyll-a Recreation 1996 TMDL approved
Non-Native Aquatic Plants Recreation 2016 TMDL priority: Low
Nitrogen, Total Recreation 2020 TMDL approved
Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Recreation 2020 TMDL approved
Phosphorus, Total Recreation 2020 TMDL approved

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Algae
Unspecified Urban Stormwater (suspected) Natural Sources (suspected)
Chlorophyll-a
Unspecified Urban Stormwater (suspected) Natural Sources (suspected)
Nitrogen, Total
Unspecified Urban Stormwater (suspected)
Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators
Unspecified Urban Stormwater (suspected) Natural Sources (suspected)
Phosphorus, Total
Unspecified Urban Stormwater (suspected)

Connecticut also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Algae; Chlorophyll-a; Non-Native Aquatic Plants; Nitrogen, Total; and Phosphorus, Total.

Reading the record

Kenosia, Lake (Danbury): Category 4A reading

4A Category 4A: impaired, TMDL completed

Connecticut filed this assessment unit as Category 4A: impaired, with a pollutant-budget TMDL already completed under 303(d). The listing remains an impairment finding; the plan is on file rather than still awaiting write-up.

How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) is one of 182 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Connecticut, and one of 97 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 57 assessed acres it ranks 16,400th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 16,399 lakes with a larger one.

Not yet on record

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

57 Top 42% larger than 58% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

6 Longer than most more listed causes than 99% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Kenosia, Lake (Danbury). Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Connecticut context

ATTAINS carries 182 lake-type waterbodies in Connecticut, 44 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 95 fully supporting. Among the 97 indexed units there, Kenosia, Lake (Danbury) ranks 3rd by listed-cause count (6 listed causes) and 72nd by assessed size among the 97 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (44 statewide) . Its listed causes include Algae and Chlorophyll-a, which also appear among Connecticut's most-filed impairment causes (led by Algae). It also lists Non-Native Aquatic Plants; Nitrogen, Total; Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators; and Phosphorus, Total, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Connecticut Assessed acres
Candlewood, Lake (New Fairfield/Danbury/Sherman/New Milford) Fully Supporting 5,086
Lillinonah, Lake (Newtown/Southbury/Bridgewater/Brookfield) Not Supporting 1,595
Bantam Lake (Litchfield/Morris) Not Supporting 955
Colebrook River (Reservoir) Lake (Colebrook) Not Assessed 852
Pachaug Pond (Griswold) Fully Supporting 837
Saugatuck Reservoir (Weston/Easton/Redding) Fully Supporting 823

Peers near Kenosia, Lake (Danbury)'s size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (57 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (6 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit CT6600-01-1-L3_01. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.