Texas reservoir · state assessment record
Lake Como
From Lake Como Dam to the reservoir headwaters in Lake Como Park in Tarrant County. Assessment decisions reported by Texas to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2024 reporting cycle.
- 11
- Assessed acres
- Reservoir
- Water type
This waterbody in one line
Lake Como, a reservoir in Texas, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 3 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2024). By assessed acreage it sits among the smaller assessed lakes nationally (38,628 lakes with a filed area); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (3 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Fish consumption is assessed as not supporting.
- Not Supporting
- overall status
- P21
- Assessed size nationally
- P5
- Shorter cause list
- Not Supporting
- fish consumption
Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.
A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.
How Lake Como reads against the filed register
Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.
The signature stat: in-state cause rank
Inside Texas, cause-list rank is the local separator: Lake Como is 20 of 323 indexed units by listed-cause count, toward the top of that state's filed lists.
Every filed use falls short
On the uses this filer ruled on, fish consumption, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.
Longer than most cause lists
3 listed causes puts this unit above 90% of assessed lake-type records by list length. Treat that as a coding-and-sampling signal: states that split pollutants finely mint longer lists without proving worse water.
Lake Como: Category 5, TMDL still owed
Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Lake Como. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.
Small within Texas
State size rank 321 of 323 puts Lake Como toward the small end of Texas's indexed lake-type units with an area.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Texas carries 489 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Lake Como without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.
The record
Designated-use assessments
Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle.
| Designated use | Group | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Fish Consumption Use | Fish-consumption or fishery | Not Supporting |
The record
Listed impairment causes
Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.
| Cause | Affected uses | First listed | Cleanup standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dioxin - Fish Consumption Advisory | Fish Consumption Use | 2016 | TMDL priority: Low |
| Dieldrin in Fish Tissue | Fish Consumption Use | 2018 | TMDL approved |
| PCBs - Fish Consumption Advisory | Fish Consumption Use | 2018 | TMDL approved |
Probable sources named by the state
Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.
- Dioxin - Fish Consumption Advisory
- Non-Point Source (suspected) Upstream Source (suspected)
- Dieldrin in Fish Tissue
- Non-Point Source (suspected) Upstream Source (suspected)
- PCBs - Fish Consumption Advisory
- Non-Point Source (suspected) Upstream Source (suspected)
Texas also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Dioxin - Fish Consumption Advisory, Dieldrin in Fish Tissue, and PCBs - Fish Consumption Advisory.
Reading the record
Where Lake Como sits among peers
67% of Texas's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported
Texas ruled definitively on a single designated use at Lake Como and found it not supported. The dataset shows 21 Texas lakes judged to that same depth.
Texas's assessed lakes are most often judged on 4 uses; this one was judged on 1.
Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All supported | 7 | 76 | 42 | 149 | 34 |
| Mixed | Not possible | 18 | 19 | 38 | 33 |
| None supported | 14 (this record) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ringed cell: Lake Como. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.
Scale and rank
Lake Como is one of 489 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Texas, and one of 323 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 11 assessed acres it ranks 30,489th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 30,488 lakes with a larger one.
Still unfiled
The state has not yet filed a definitive recreation verdict and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.
In context
Where Lake Como sits nationally
Assessed size among U.S. lakes
Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once
11 Top 79% larger than 21% of 38,628 lakes
lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value
Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026
Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict
How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry
3 Longer than most more listed causes than 90% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict
named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value
Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026
In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Lake Como. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.
In context
Texas context
ATTAINS carries 489 lake-type waterbodies in Texas, 125 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 331 fully supporting. Among the 323 indexed units there, Lake Como ranks 20th by listed-cause count (3 listed causes) and 321st by assessed size among the 323 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (125 statewide) . Its listed causes include Dioxin - Fish Consumption Advisory and PCBs - Fish Consumption Advisory, which also appear among Texas's most-filed impairment causes (led by Algae). It also lists Dieldrin in Fish Tissue, outside that top-five list.
| Other large assessed lakes in Texas | Assessed acres |
|---|---|
| Lake Texoma Fully Supporting | 49,400 |
| Toledo Bend Reservoir Not Supporting | 41,046 |
| International Falcon Reservoir Fully Supporting | 36,817 |
| Sam Rayburn Reservoir Not Supporting | 28,238 |
| International Amistad Reservoir Fully Supporting | 21,328 |
| Lake Livingston Not Supporting | 18,238 |
Peers near Lake Como's size or cause load
Similar assessed acres
Nearest filed extents (11 acres here).
- Larson Lake · 11 acres · WI
- Preston Pond · 11 acres · NH
- Tapps Lake · 11 acres · WA
- Echo Lake · 11 acres · WI
Similar cause load
Nearest listed-cause counts (3 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.
- 67th St. Beach · 3 causes · IL
- Abiquiu Reservoir · 3 causes · NM
- Absecon Creek (AC Reserviors) (gage to SB) · 3 causes · NJ
- Absecon Creek (below gage) · 3 causes · NJ
What to do with this record
- The fish-consumption use is assessed as not supporting. Before eating fish from this reservoir, check your state fish-advisory program for species-specific meal limits. Consumption status guide
- Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained
PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.
Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit TX-0829A_01. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.