New York reservoir · state assessment record

Lake Pleasant

Assessment decisions reported by New York to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2022 reporting cycle, a cycle that carries an interim EPA action.

1,450
Assessed acres
Lake / Reservoir / Pond
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Lake Pleasant, a reservoir in New York, is assessed as fully supporting its designated uses, with no impairment causes listed in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2022), a cycle that carries an interim EPA action. By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 5% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is shorter than on half of assessed lakes (0 listed causes).

Fully Supporting
overall status
P96
Assessed size nationally
P51
Shorter cause list

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

A+
Water Quality Standing
94/100
Lake Pleasant

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationA+
Meeting criteria
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeN/A
Not assessed
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
0 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes on this record
Assessment CurrencyB+
2022
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Where Lake Pleasant stands in the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is a short cause list: 0 causes, shorter than 51% of assessed lake-type units. A short list can mean a focused impairment, or a shallow assessment.

Large assessed unit

At 1,450 acres, Lake Pleasant clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (1,729 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

Every ruled-on use is fully supporting

The filed use determinations for recreation are all Fully Supporting. Where an overall IR category still flags the unit, look at the cause list and report standing rather than treating the use row as empty.

IR category in the supporting band

EPA's Integrated Report category for Lake Pleasant is 2. In ATTAINS that band means the assessed uses are supporting (or supporting with other waters in the unit), so the narrative weight shifts to how deep the assessment went and whether monitoring is current, not to a restoration plan.

Overall status: fully supporting

Overall status is Fully Supporting. If an IR category or cause row still appears, it usually reflects a prior listing path or a use the overall rollup does not collapse, read those sections rather than stopping at the tile.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, New York carries 2,231 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Lake Pleasant without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Interim EPA action. New York decided this in its 2022 Integrated Report, which carries an interim EPA action and has not been finalized. The decisions below are what New York has proposed for that cycle; they can change before EPA takes final action on the cycle.
Limited-coverage record. The reported record for this reservoir currently lacks a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive aquatic-life verdict, listed impairment causes, among other dimensions. It is shown for completeness; the richer records for New York are on the state page.
Reporting cycle
2022
Interim EPA action
Listing category
Category 2
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle.

Designated use Group Verdict
Primary Contact Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Secondary Contact Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Water Supply Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting
Fishing Aquatic-life or related Insufficient Information

The record

Listed impairment causes

The state's reported assessment lists no impairment causes for this reservoir.

Reading the record

Lake Pleasant: Category 2 reading

2 Category 2: some uses supported, others not assessed

New York filed this assessment unit as Category 2: some designated uses are supported and others were not assessed in this cycle. Absence of a failing verdict is not the same as a full Category 1 finding.

How these categories work.

Scale and rank

Lake Pleasant is one of 2,231 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from New York. It is not among the 428 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 1,450 assessed acres it ranks 1,730th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 1,729 lakes with a larger one.

What this record holds

New York completed an assessment here and listed no impairment cause, so the record holds a verdict and its supporting use rows but no pollutant to track over time. The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Why no water-level record

Lake Pleasant has no daily USGS water-level or reservoir-storage series on this page because NWIS lists a lake monitoring site named for the waterbody, but the site is not active, and PlainLakes ingests only the active inventory, so there is no series to attach. How PlainLakes links gauges.

In context

Where Lake Pleasant sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

1,450 Top 4% larger than 96% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

0 Among the shortest cause lists fewer listed causes than 51% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Lake Pleasant. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

New York context

ATTAINS carries 2,231 lake-type waterbodies in New York, 563 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 79 fully supporting.

Other large assessed lakes in New York Assessed acres
Lake Champlain, Main Lake, Middle Not Supporting 54,972
Oneida Lake Not Supporting 51,269
Seneca Lake, Main Lake, Middle Fully Supporting 40,290
Cayuga Lake, Main Lake, Mid-South Fully Supporting 33,083
Lake George Not Supporting 28,523
Great Sacandaga Lake Not Supporting 24,722

Peers near Lake Pleasant's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (1,450 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (0 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit NY1104-0051. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.