Wisconsin reservoir · state assessment record

Lake Redstone

In Sauk County. Assessment decisions reported by Wisconsin to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle.

605
Assessed acres
Reservoir
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Lake Redstone, a reservoir in Wisconsin, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 10% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting. Fish consumption is assessed as fully supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P92
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

C-
Water Quality Standing
51/100
Lake Redstone

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionA+
Meeting criteria
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2026
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Reading Lake Redstone's filed record

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: assessed size

The number that most separates Lake Redstone nationally is assessed size: 604.6 acres, larger than 92% of the 38,628 lake-type units with an area on file.

A split ruling across uses

This record splits: Not Supporting on recreation, aquatic life, Fully Supporting on fish consumption. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Lake Redstone: Category 4A reading

Category 4A means a TMDL (or equivalent) is already approved for the impairment on Lake Redstone. The remaining work is implementation and tracking, read the cleanup-standing and cause rows for what the state already committed to address.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Lake Redstone is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Typical cause-list length

1 listed cause is a middle-tercile list length among assessed lake-type units. Look to IR category and use outcomes for the distinctive reading.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Wisconsin carries 19,871 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Lake Redstone without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2026
Monitored through 2025 · Wisconsin Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 4A
Uses with verdicts
3
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. The latest monitoring Wisconsin filed against this record runs through 2025. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Wisconsin filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Wisconsin filed its own confidence on the 3 definitive verdicts it rated: Fair and Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish and Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Fair on biological; Good on physical/chemical
Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Public Health and Welfare Recreation Not Assessed
Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Phosphorus, Total Recreation; Fish and Aquatic Life 2014 TMDL approved

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Phosphorus, Total
Grazing in Riparian or Shoreline Zones (suspected)

Reading the record

Lake Redstone: Category 4A reading

4A Category 4A: impaired, TMDL completed

Wisconsin filed this assessment unit as Category 4A: impaired, with a pollutant-budget TMDL already completed under 303(d). The listing remains an impairment finding; the plan is on file rather than still awaiting write-up.

How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

Lake Redstone is one of 19,871 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Wisconsin, and one of 1,219 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 605 assessed acres it ranks 3,269th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 3,268 lakes with a larger one.

In context

Where Lake Redstone sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

605 Top 8% larger than 92% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Lake Redstone. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Wisconsin context

ATTAINS carries 19,871 lake-type waterbodies in Wisconsin, 493 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 4,225 fully supporting. Among the 1,219 indexed units there, Lake Redstone ranks 117th by listed-cause count (one listed cause) and 169th by assessed size among the 1,170 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (493 statewide) . Its listed causes include Phosphorus, Total, which also appears among Wisconsin's most-filed impairment causes (led by Phosphorus, Total).

Other large assessed lakes in Wisconsin Assessed acres
Lake Winnebago Not Supporting 131,942
Lake Pepin Not Supporting 25,503
Petenwell Lake Not Supporting 23,001
Lake Poygan Not Supporting 14,024
Lake Chippewa Fully Supporting 13,616
Turtle Flambeau Flowage Not Supporting 12,943

Peers near Lake Redstone's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (605 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit WI10002733. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.