Montana lake · state assessment record

Oilmont Wetland

Assessment decisions reported by Montana to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2000 reporting cycle.

21
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Oilmont Wetland, a lake in Montana, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 3 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2000). By assessed acreage it sits below the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (3 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P34
Assessed size nationally
P5
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
2/100
Oilmont Wetland

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterF
Not supporting
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
3 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2000
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Reading Oilmont Wetland's filed record

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 3 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 90% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

Every filed use falls short

On the uses this filer ruled on, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Oilmont Wetland: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Oilmont Wetland. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Small within Montana

State size rank 49 of 52 puts Oilmont Wetland toward the small end of Montana's indexed lake-type units with an area.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Oilmont Wetland is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Montana carries 73 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Oilmont Wetland without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2000
Montana Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
2
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Montana filed the assessment basis as Monitored & Extrapolated Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them; where a verdict is filed as extrapolated, the state did not reach it from monitoring alone.

Designated use Group Verdict
Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Drinking Water Drinking-water supply designation Not Supporting
Agricultural Other Not Assessed
Primary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Arsenic Drinking Water 2000 TMDL priority: Low
Alteration in Stream-Side or Littoral Vegetative Covers Aquatic Life Not reported None reported
Flow Regime Modification Aquatic Life Not reported None reported

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Arsenic
Highways, Roads, Bridges, Infrastructure (New Construction) (suspected) Petroleum/Natural Gas Activities (suspected)
Alteration in Stream-Side or Littoral Vegetative Covers
Highways, Roads, Bridges, Infrastructure (New Construction) (suspected) Petroleum/Natural Gas Activities (suspected)
Flow Regime Modification
Highways, Roads, Bridges, Infrastructure (New Construction) (suspected) Petroleum/Natural Gas Activities (suspected)

Reading the record

Assessment basis on Oilmont Wetland

1 filed assessment basis on this record

For the definitive verdicts on this record, Montana filed the assessment basis as Monitored & Extrapolated Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them; where a verdict is filed as extrapolated, the state did not reach it from monitoring alone.

The cycle is when the state reported; the monitoring year, where filed, is when it measured. How to read assessment currency.

Scale and rank

Oilmont Wetland is one of 73 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Montana, and one of 52 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 21 assessed acres it ranks 25,669th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 25,668 lakes with a larger one.

Awaiting a filing

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive recreation verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Montana carried the trophic field for this assessment unit and filed it as unclassified, which records that no class was determined rather than that the water is unenriched. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where Oilmont Wetland sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

21 Top 66% larger than 34% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

3 Longer than most more listed causes than 90% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Oilmont Wetland. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Montana context

ATTAINS carries 73 lake-type waterbodies in Montana, 28 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 28 fully supporting. Among the 52 indexed units there, Oilmont Wetland ranks 14th by listed-cause count (3 listed causes) and 49th by assessed size among the 52 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (28 statewide) . Its listed causes include Flow Regime Modification, which also appears among Montana's most-filed impairment causes (led by Flow Regime Modification). It also lists Arsenic and Alteration in Stream-Side or Littoral Vegetative Covers, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Montana Assessed acres
Fort Peck Reservoir Not Supporting 233,296
Flathead Lake Not Supporting 57,305
Canyon Ferry Reservoir Not Supporting 32,810
Lake Koocanusa Not Supporting 28,875
Hungry Horse Reservoir Fully Supporting 23,596
Lake Elwell (Tiber Reservoir) Fully Supporting 15,041

Peers near Oilmont Wetland's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (21 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (3 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MT41P005_010. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.