Massachusetts lake · state assessment record

Onota Lake

Assessment decisions reported by Massachusetts to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle, a cycle that is open for public comment.

664
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Onota Lake, a lake in Massachusetts, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 5 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026), a cycle that is open for public comment. By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 10% by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (5 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P92
Assessed size nationally
P1
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
30/100
Onota Lake

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
5 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyA+
2026
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Onota Lake against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 5 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 97% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

Every filed use falls short

On the uses this filer ruled on, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Large assessed unit

At 664 acres, Onota Lake clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (3,048 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

Onota Lake: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Onota Lake. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Large within Massachusetts

Among Massachusetts's 678 indexed units with an area, Onota Lake ranks 11 by assessed size, toward the large end of that state file.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Massachusetts carries 1,191 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Onota Lake without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Cycle open for public comment. Massachusetts decided this in its 2026 Integrated Report, which is open for public comment and has not been finalized. The decisions below are what Massachusetts has proposed for that cycle; they can change before the cycle is submitted to EPA.
Reporting cycle
2026
Cycle open for public comment
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
1
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the one definitive verdict on this record, Massachusetts filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Aesthetic Other Not Assessed
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Insufficient Information
Primary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Assessed
Secondary Contact Recreation Recreation Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Eurasian Water Milfoil, Myriophyllum Spicatum Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 1992 None reported
Brittle Naiad, Najas Minor Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2020 None reported
Curly-Leaf Pondweed Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2020 None reported
Dissolved Oxygen Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2020 TMDL priority: Low
Water Chestnut Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2020 None reported

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Eurasian Water Milfoil, Myriophyllum Spicatum
Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
Brittle Naiad, Najas Minor
Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
Curly-Leaf Pondweed
Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)
Water Chestnut
Introduction of Non-Native Organisms (Accidental or Intentional) (confirmed)

Massachusetts also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Dissolved Oxygen.

Reading the record

Where Onota Lake sits among peers

95% of Massachusetts's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported (the standard result at this depth, not a distinction)

Massachusetts ruled definitively on a single designated use at Onota Lake and found it not supported. The dataset shows 298 Massachusetts lakes judged to that same depth.

Massachusetts's assessed lakes are most often judged on 1 use, as this one was.

95 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Massachusetts lakes judged on a single designated use with the same outcome
Assessed lakes in Massachusetts by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Massachusetts by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 15141100
Mixed Not possible5193112
None supported 283 (this record)609112849

Ringed cell: Onota Lake. Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

Onota Lake is one of 1,191 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Massachusetts, and one of 678 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 664 assessed acres it ranks 3,049th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 3,048 lakes with a larger one.

Not yet on record

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive recreation verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Onota Lake sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

664 Top 8% larger than 92% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

5 Longer than most more listed causes than 97% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Onota Lake. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Massachusetts context

ATTAINS carries 1,191 lake-type waterbodies in Massachusetts, 678 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 40 fully supporting. Among the 678 indexed units there, Onota Lake ranks 53rd by listed-cause count (5 listed causes) and 11th by assessed size among the 678 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (678 statewide) . Its listed causes include Dissolved Oxygen, which also appears among Massachusetts's most-filed impairment causes (led by Mercury in Fish Tissue). It also lists Eurasian Water Milfoil, Myriophyllum Spicatum; Brittle Naiad, Najas Minor; Curly-Leaf Pondweed; and Water Chestnut, outside that top-five list.

Other large assessed lakes in Massachusetts Assessed acres
Quabbin Reservoir Not Supporting 24,010
Wachusett Reservoir Not Supporting 3,962
Assawompset Pond Not Assessed 2,034
North Watuppa Pond Not Supporting 1,728
Long Pond Not Supporting 1,728
South Watuppa Pond Not Supporting 1,473

Peers near Onota Lake's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (664 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (5 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MA21078. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.