Colorado reservoir · state assessment record

Rocky Mountain Lake

Assessment decisions reported by Colorado to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2019 reporting cycle.

23
Assessed acres
Lake / Reservoir / Pond
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Rocky Mountain Lake, a reservoir in Colorado, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 2 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2019). By assessed acreage it sits below the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (2 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P36
Assessed size nationally
P10
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

C-
Water Quality Standing
51/100
Rocky Mountain Lake

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationA+
Meeting criteria
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
2 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2019
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Rocky Mountain Lake against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 2 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 80% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

A split ruling across uses

This record splits: Not Supporting on aquatic life, Fully Supporting on recreation. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

Rocky Mountain Lake: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Rocky Mountain Lake. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Rocky Mountain Lake is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Small within Colorado

State size rank 103 of 122 puts Rocky Mountain Lake toward the small end of Colorado's indexed lake-type units with an area.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Colorado carries 344 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Rocky Mountain Lake without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2019
Monitored through 2018 · Colorado Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
4
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Colorado filed 2018 as the year this waterbody was last monitored.

Designated use Group Verdict
Agriculture Other Fully Supporting
Aquatic Life Warm Water-Class 1 Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Water Supply Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Mercury in Fish Tissue Aquatic Life Warm Water-Class 1 2008 TMDL priority: High
pH Aquatic Life Warm Water-Class 1 2008 TMDL priority: Low

Reading the record

Cleanup queue for Rocky Mountain Lake

1 listed cause ranked High in the TMDL queue, still without a plan

Colorado ranked Mercury in Fish Tissue high in its TMDL development queue, and no cleanup plan is on file for that listing yet. That queue rank is the state's own scheduling signal, not an EPA national rule.

A High ranking names a position in the state's plan-writing queue; it is not a measure of how impaired the water is. How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

Rocky Mountain Lake is one of 344 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Colorado, and one of 122 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 23 assessed acres it ranks 24,820th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 24,819 lakes with a larger one.

Still unfiled

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Why no water-level record

Rocky Mountain Lake has no daily USGS water-level or reservoir-storage series on this page because NWIS lists a lake monitoring site named for the waterbody, but the site is not active, and PlainLakes ingests only the active inventory, so there is no series to attach. How PlainLakes links gauges.

In context

Where Rocky Mountain Lake sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

23 Top 64% larger than 36% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

2 Longer than most more listed causes than 80% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Rocky Mountain Lake. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Colorado context

ATTAINS carries 344 lake-type waterbodies in Colorado, 89 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 74 fully supporting. Among the 122 indexed units there, Rocky Mountain Lake ranks 35th by listed-cause count (2 listed causes) and 103rd by assessed size among the 122 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (89 statewide) . Its listed causes include Mercury in Fish Tissue and pH, which also appear among Colorado's most-filed impairment causes (led by Arsenic).

Other large assessed lakes in Colorado Assessed acres
John Martin Reservoir. Not Supporting 17,147
Blue Mesa Reservoir Fully Supporting 8,957
Lake Granby. Not Supporting 7,036
Two Buttes Reservoir, Two Buttes Pond, Hasty Lake, Holbrook Reservoir, Burchfield Lake, Nee-Skah (Queens) Reservoir, Neeso Pah Reservoir, Nee Noshe Reservoir. Fully Supporting 6,123
Lake and reserviors tributary to the South Platte River Not Assessed 5,770
Lake Meredith. Not Supporting 5,531

Peers near Rocky Mountain Lake's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (23 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (2 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit COSPUS17a_E. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.