Michigan Great Lakes waterbody · state assessment record

Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay

Assessment decisions reported by Michigan to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2018 reporting cycle.

223.10
Miles of shoreline
Great Lakes Shoreline
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay, a Great Lakes waterbody in Michigan, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2018). Its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P20
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
35/100
Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2018
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Where Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay stands in the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: in-state cause rank

Inside Michigan, this unit sits toward the short-list end: cause-list rank 685 of 776 indexed units.

Every ruled-on use is not supporting

On the uses this filer ruled on, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Typical cause-list length

1 listed cause is a middle-tercile list length among assessed lake-type units. Look to IR category and use outcomes for the distinctive reading.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Michigan carries 4,307 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2018
Michigan Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
1
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the one definitive verdict on this record, Michigan filed the assessment basis as Monitored & Extrapolated Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them; where a verdict is filed as extrapolated, the state did not reach it from monitoring alone. Michigan filed its own confidence on the one definitive verdict it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Other Indigenous Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Agriculture Other Not Assessed
Cold Water Fishery Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Assessed
Industrial Water Supply Other Not Assessed
Navigation Other Not Assessed
Partial Body Contact Recreation Recreation Not Assessed
Total Body Contact Recreation Recreation Not Assessed
Warm Water Fishery Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this Great Lakes waterbody, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Eutrophication, Nutrients Other Indigenous Aquatic Life and Wildlife 2022 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources

Michigan listed the source of the impairment as unknown. That is the state's own filed value, not a gap in this record: the cause has been identified, the origin has not.

Reading the record

Assessment basis on Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay

1 filed assessment basis on this record

For the one definitive verdict on this record, Michigan filed the assessment basis as Monitored & Extrapolated Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them; where a verdict is filed as extrapolated, the state did not reach it from monitoring alone.

The cycle is when the state reported; the monitoring year, where filed, is when it measured. How to read assessment currency.

Scale and rank

Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay is one of 4,307 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Michigan, and one of 776 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. Michigan reports this unit as 223.10 miles of shoreline rather than a surface area, so it is not ranked against the acreage figures elsewhere on this site.

Still unfiled

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive recreation verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay sits nationally

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Michigan context

ATTAINS carries 4,307 lake-type waterbodies in Michigan, 807 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 3,457 fully supporting. Among the 776 indexed units there, Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay ranks 685th by listed-cause count (one listed cause) ; it sits in the not-supporting set (807 statewide) . Its listed causes (Eutrophication, Nutrients) sit outside Michigan's top-five list, which is led by Mercury in Fish Tissue.

Other large assessed lakes in Michigan Assessed acres
Lake Huron (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 5,815,360
Lake Michigan South of Frankfort (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 5,665,920
St. Marys River Not Supporting 129,983
Lake St. Clair (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 103,616
Lake Erie (Michigan Jurisdiction) Not Supporting 71,680
Houghton Lake Not Supporting 20,066

Lakes near Saginaw Bay Shoreline, Inner Bay's cause load

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit MI040803000001-25. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.