Illinois lake · state assessment record

Shop

Assessment decisions reported by Illinois to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2026 reporting cycle, a cycle that is open for public comment.

25
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Shop, a lake in Illinois, is assessed as fully supporting its designated uses, with no impairment causes listed in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2026), a cycle that is open for public comment. By assessed acreage it sits below the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is shorter than on half of assessed lakes (0 listed causes). Fish consumption is assessed as fully supporting.

Fully Supporting
overall status
P38
Assessed size nationally
P51
Shorter cause list
Fully Supporting
fish consumption

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

A+
Water Quality Standing
100/100
Shop

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeN/A
Not assessed
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionA+
Meeting criteria
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
0 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes on this record
Assessment CurrencyA+
2026
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Reading Shop's filed record

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: monitoring lag

The signature tension is currency: the reporting cycle is 2026 while monitoring evidence runs through 2017, a 9-year gap. Cycle year and last-monitored year move independently in ATTAINS; this page shows both.

Shorter than most cause lists

Only 0 causes on file, shorter than 51% of assessed lake-type units. Pair the short list with the use matrix: a single Not Supporting use can still be the whole story.

All ruled-on uses pass

The filed use determinations for fish consumption are all Fully Supporting. Where an overall IR category still flags the unit, look at the cause list and report standing rather than treating the use row as empty.

IR category in the supporting band

EPA's Integrated Report category for Shop is 1. In ATTAINS that band means the assessed uses are supporting (or supporting with other waters in the unit), so the narrative weight shifts to how deep the assessment went and whether monitoring is current, not to a restoration plan.

Overall status: fully supporting

Overall status is Fully Supporting. If an IR category or cause row still appears, it usually reflects a prior listing path or a use the overall rollup does not collapse, read those sections rather than stopping at the tile.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Illinois carries 783 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Shop without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Cycle open for public comment. Illinois decided this in its 2026 Integrated Report, which is open for public comment and has not been finalized. The decisions below are what Illinois has proposed for that cycle; they can change before the cycle is submitted to EPA.
Limited-coverage record. The reported record for this lake currently lacks a definitive recreation verdict, a definitive aquatic-life verdict, listed impairment causes, among other dimensions. It is shown for completeness; the richer records for Illinois are on the state page.
Reporting cycle
2026
Monitored through 2017 · Cycle open for public comment
Listing category
Category 1
Uses with verdicts
1
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Monitoring behind at least one of these designated-use verdicts ran through 2017, as Illinois filed it. Illinois filed its own confidence on the one definitive verdict it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good

The record

Listed impairment causes

The state's reported assessment lists no impairment causes for this lake.

Reading the record

Shop: Category 1 reading

1 Category 1: all designated uses supported

Illinois filed this assessment unit as Category 1: every designated use assessed here was reported as supported. That is the filer's Integrated Report classification, not a PlainLakes score.

How these categories work.

Scale and rank

Shop is one of 783 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Illinois. It is not among the 439 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 25 assessed acres it ranks 24,181st by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 24,180 lakes with a larger one.

What this record holds

Illinois completed an assessment here and listed no impairment cause, so the record holds a verdict and its supporting use rows but no pollutant to track over time. The state has not yet filed a definitive recreation verdict and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Shop sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

25 Top 62% larger than 38% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

0 Among the shortest cause lists fewer listed causes than 51% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Shop. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Illinois context

ATTAINS carries 783 lake-type waterbodies in Illinois, 434 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 63 fully supporting.

Other large assessed lakes in Illinois Assessed acres
Lake Michigan Nearshore Not Supporting 125,440
Carlyle Not Supporting 24,580
Rend Not Supporting 18,900
Shelbyville Not Supporting 11,000
Crab Orchard Not Supporting 6,965
Clinton Not Supporting 4,895

Peers near Shop's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (25 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (0 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit IL_RNZZ. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.