Connecticut lake · state assessment record

West Thompson Lake (Thompson)

Assessment decisions reported by Connecticut to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2008 reporting cycle.

189
Assessed acres
Lake, Freshwater
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

West Thompson Lake (Thompson), a lake in Connecticut, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with 3 listed impairment causes in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2008). By assessed acreage it sits in the upper quartile by assessed acreage nationally (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (3 listed causes vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P81
Assessed size nationally
P5
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

F
Water Quality Standing
2/100
West Thompson Lake (Thompson)

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationF
Not supporting
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenF
3 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyF
2008
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

West Thompson Lake (Thompson) against the ATTAINS register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: cause-list length

The standout filed fact is cause-list length: 3 listed impairment causes, a longer list than 90% of assessed lake-type units (n=23,610). List length tracks how states sample and code, not a severity score.

Every filed use falls short

On the uses this filer ruled on, recreation, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

West Thompson Lake (Thompson): Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for West Thompson Lake (Thompson). Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Large assessed unit

At 189.3 acres, West Thompson Lake (Thompson) clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (7,542 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for West Thompson Lake (Thompson) is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Connecticut carries 182 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to West Thompson Lake (Thompson) without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2008
Connecticut Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
2
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. Connecticut filed its own confidence on the 2 definitive verdicts it rated: Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Recreation Recreation Not Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Insufficient Information
Filer confidence: Good

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this lake, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Algae Recreation; Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife 1996 TMDL priority: Low
Chlorophyll-a Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife; Recreation 1996 TMDL priority: Low
Nutrients Habitat for Fish, Other Aquatic Life and Wildlife; Recreation 1996 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Algae
Internal Nutrient Recycling (suspected) Municipal Point Source Discharges (suspected) Sources Outside State Jurisdiction or Borders (suspected) Agriculture (suspected)
Chlorophyll-a
Internal Nutrient Recycling (suspected) Municipal Point Source Discharges (suspected) Sources Outside State Jurisdiction or Borders (suspected) Agriculture (suspected)
Nutrients
Internal Nutrient Recycling (suspected) Municipal Point Source Discharges (suspected) Sources Outside State Jurisdiction or Borders (suspected) Agriculture (suspected)

Connecticut also recorded the source of at least one listing here as unknown, including for Algae, Chlorophyll-a, and Nutrients.

Reading the record

Where West Thompson Lake (Thompson) sits among peers

14% of Connecticut's lakes assessed this deeply also had no use supported

Connecticut ruled definitively on 2 designated uses at West Thompson Lake (Thompson) and found none of them supported. The dataset shows 74 Connecticut lakes judged to that same depth.

Connecticut's assessed lakes are most often judged on 2 uses, as this one was.

14 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Connecticut lakes judged on 2 designated uses with the same outcome
Assessed lakes in Connecticut by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out
Less More
Assessed lakes in Connecticut by how many uses were ruled on and how those rulings came out (lakes)
12345+
All supported 4253000
Mixed Not possible11510
None supported 1610 (this record)100

Ringed cell: West Thompson Lake (Thompson). Source: EPA ATTAINS, Reporting cycles 1987–2026.

Scale and rank

West Thompson Lake (Thompson) is one of 182 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Connecticut, and one of 97 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 189 assessed acres it ranks 7,543rd by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 7,542 lakes with a larger one.

Open in the register

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where West Thompson Lake (Thompson) sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

189 Top 19% larger than 81% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

3 Longer than most more listed causes than 90% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark West Thompson Lake (Thompson). Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Connecticut context

ATTAINS carries 182 lake-type waterbodies in Connecticut, 44 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 95 fully supporting. Among the 97 indexed units there, West Thompson Lake (Thompson) ranks 18th by listed-cause count (3 listed causes) and 31st by assessed size among the 97 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (44 statewide) . Its listed causes include Algae, Chlorophyll-a, and Nutrients, which also appear among Connecticut's most-filed impairment causes (led by Algae).

Other large assessed lakes in Connecticut Assessed acres
Candlewood, Lake (New Fairfield/Danbury/Sherman/New Milford) Fully Supporting 5,086
Lillinonah, Lake (Newtown/Southbury/Bridgewater/Brookfield) Not Supporting 1,595
Bantam Lake (Litchfield/Morris) Not Supporting 955
Colebrook River (Reservoir) Lake (Colebrook) Not Assessed 852
Pachaug Pond (Griswold) Fully Supporting 837
Saugatuck Reservoir (Weston/Easton/Redding) Fully Supporting 823

Peers near West Thompson Lake (Thompson)'s size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (189 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (3 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit CT3700-00-2+L1_01. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.