Wisconsin reservoir · state assessment record

White Tail Flowage

In Jackson County. Assessment decisions reported by Wisconsin to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2022 reporting cycle.

94
Assessed acres
Reservoir
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

White Tail Flowage, a reservoir in Wisconsin, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2022). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as fully supporting. Fish consumption is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P69
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list
Fully Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

B-
Water Quality Standing
69/100
White Tail Flowage

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterN/A
Not assessed
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeA+
Meeting criteria
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionF
Not supporting
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyB+
2022
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

How White Tail Flowage reads against the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: monitoring lag

The signature tension is currency: the reporting cycle is 2022 while monitoring evidence runs through 2010, a 12-year gap. Cycle year and last-monitored year move independently in ATTAINS; this page shows both.

The uses disagree

This record splits: Not Supporting on fish consumption, Fully Supporting on aquatic life. The divergence is inside the designated-use matrix, not a single all-or-nothing label.

White Tail Flowage: Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for White Tail Flowage. Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for White Tail Flowage is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Large assessed unit

At 94 acres, White Tail Flowage clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (12,178 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Wisconsin carries 19,871 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to White Tail Flowage without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2022
Monitored through 2010 · Wisconsin Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
2
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. The latest monitoring Wisconsin filed against this record runs through 2010. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Wisconsin filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Wisconsin filed its own confidence on the one definitive verdict it rated: Low. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Fish Consumption Fish-consumption or fishery Not Supporting
Fish and Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Low
Public Health and Welfare Recreation Not Assessed
Recreation Recreation Not Assessed
Wildlife Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Mercury Fish Consumption 2002 TMDL priority: Low

Probable sources named by the state

Each source below is listed under the cause the state filed it against, and carries the word the state filed with it — confirmed, or suspected.

Mercury
Atmospheric Deposition - Toxics (confirmed)

Reading the record

How current is White Tail Flowage's evidence?

12 years between the 2022 reporting cycle and monitoring through 2010

The latest monitoring Wisconsin filed against this record runs through 2010. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Wisconsin filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them.

The cycle is when the state reported; the monitoring year, where filed, is when it measured. How to read assessment currency.

Scale and rank

White Tail Flowage is one of 19,871 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Wisconsin, and one of 1,219 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 94 assessed acres it ranks 12,179th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 12,178 lakes with a larger one.

Awaiting a filing

The state has not yet filed a definitive recreation verdict for this record; that field populates when it reports it in a future Integrated Report cycle.

Reported trophic class

Wisconsin carried the trophic field for this assessment unit and filed it as unclassified, which records that no class was determined rather than that the water is unenriched. What the trophic scale measures.

In context

Where White Tail Flowage sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

94 Top 31% larger than 69% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark White Tail Flowage. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Wisconsin context

ATTAINS carries 19,871 lake-type waterbodies in Wisconsin, 493 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 4,225 fully supporting. Among the 1,219 indexed units there, White Tail Flowage ranks 315th by listed-cause count (one listed cause) and 763rd by assessed size among the 1,170 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (493 statewide) . Its listed causes include Mercury, which also appears among Wisconsin's most-filed impairment causes (led by Phosphorus, Total).

Other large assessed lakes in Wisconsin Assessed acres
Lake Winnebago Not Supporting 131,942
Lake Pepin Not Supporting 25,503
Petenwell Lake Not Supporting 23,001
Lake Poygan Not Supporting 14,024
Lake Chippewa Fully Supporting 13,616
Turtle Flambeau Flowage Not Supporting 12,943

Peers near White Tail Flowage's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (94 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • The fish-consumption use is assessed as not supporting. Before eating fish from this reservoir, check your state fish-advisory program for species-specific meal limits. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit WI10003143. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.