Tennessee reservoir · state assessment record

Barkley Reservoir

Assessment decisions reported by Tennessee to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2024 reporting cycle.

16,541
Assessed acres
Lake / Reservoir / Pond
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

Barkley Reservoir, a reservoir in Tennessee, is assessed as fully supporting its designated uses, with no impairment causes listed in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2024). By assessed acreage it sits among the largest 1% of assessed lakes nationally (38,628 lakes with a filed area); its impairment list is shorter than on half of assessed lakes (0 listed causes).

Fully Supporting
overall status
P100
Assessed size nationally
P51
Shorter cause list

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

A+
Water Quality Standing
98/100
Barkley Reservoir

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationA+
Meeting criteria
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeN/A
Not assessed
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
0 causes
Filed pollutant/stressor causes on this record
Assessment CurrencyA+
2024
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Reading Barkley Reservoir's filed record

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: assessed size

The number that most separates Barkley Reservoir nationally is assessed size: 16,541 acres, larger than 100% of the 38,628 lake-type units with an area on file.

Shorter than most cause lists

Only 0 causes on file, shorter than 51% of assessed lake-type units. Pair the short list with the use matrix: a single Not Supporting use can still be the whole story.

Every filed use clears the bar

The filed use determinations for recreation are all Fully Supporting. Where an overall IR category still flags the unit, look at the cause list and report standing rather than treating the use row as empty.

IR category in the supporting band

EPA's Integrated Report category for Barkley Reservoir is 2. In ATTAINS that band means the assessed uses are supporting (or supporting with other waters in the unit), so the narrative weight shifts to how deep the assessment went and whether monitoring is current, not to a restoration plan.

Overall status: fully supporting

Overall status is Fully Supporting. If an IR category or cause row still appears, it usually reflects a prior listing path or a use the overall rollup does not collapse, read those sections rather than stopping at the tile.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Tennessee carries 117 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to Barkley Reservoir without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Limited-coverage record. The reported record for this reservoir currently lacks a definitive fish-consumption verdict, a definitive aquatic-life verdict, listed impairment causes, among other dimensions. It is shown for completeness; the richer records for Tennessee are on the state page.
Reporting cycle
2024
Tennessee Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 2
Uses with verdicts
5
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle. For the definitive verdicts on this record, Tennessee filed the assessment basis as Monitored Data. Those are EPA's own words, not PlainLakes' summary of them. Tennessee filed its own confidence on the 5 definitive verdicts it rated: Fair and Good. That rating is the filer's, in EPA's own field, and EPA publishes no definition of the four words it offers.

Designated use Group Verdict
Domestic Water Supply Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Industrial Water Supply Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Irrigation Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Livestock Watering and Wildlife Other Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Good
Recreation Recreation Fully Supporting
Filer confidence: Fair on pathogen indicators; Good on other public health indicators
Fish and Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Not Assessed

The record

Listed impairment causes

The state's reported assessment lists no impairment causes for this reservoir.

Reading the record

Barkley Reservoir: Category 2 reading

2 Category 2: some uses supported, others not assessed

Tennessee filed this assessment unit as Category 2: some designated uses are supported and others were not assessed in this cycle. Absence of a failing verdict is not the same as a full Category 1 finding.

How these categories work.

Scale and rank

Barkley Reservoir is one of 117 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from Tennessee. It is not among the 73 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 16,541 assessed acres it ranks 185th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 184 lakes with a larger one.

What this record holds

Tennessee completed an assessment here and listed no impairment cause, so the record holds a verdict and its supporting use rows but no pollutant to track over time. The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive aquatic-life verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where Barkley Reservoir sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

16,541 Top 1% larger than 99%+ of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

0 Among the shortest cause lists fewer listed causes than 51% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark Barkley Reservoir. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

Tennessee context

ATTAINS carries 117 lake-type waterbodies in Tennessee, 60 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 16 fully supporting.

Other large assessed lakes in Tennessee Assessed acres
Kentucky Reservoir Fully Supporting 99,500
Chickamauga Reservoir Fully Supporting 35,400
Watts Bar Reservoir Not Supporting 34,075
Douglas Reservoir Fully Supporting 30,400
Old Hickory Reservoir Fully Supporting 27,439
Cherokee Reservoir Not Supporting 25,964

Peers near Barkley Reservoir's size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (16,541 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (0 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit TN05130205015_2000. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.