State water-quality picture · #39 by reported lake-type waterbodies

Tennessee lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions Tennessee reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 2017–2026), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

117
Reported waterbodies
60
Not supporting a use
Not reported
Fish use assessments
0
Gauged lakes

Tennessee in one line

117 lake-type waterbodies in Tennessee are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 2017–2026: 60 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 16 fully supporting, and 41 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Mercury in Fish Tissue, on 31 waterbodies.

117
reported waterbodies
60
not supporting a use
16
fully supporting
79%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

A compact Tennessee register with a concentrated not-supporting share

Tennessee's 117 lake-type units sit in the smallest third of state inventories, yet the ruled not-supporting share (79%) is in the upper third. The load is dense relative to register size.

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Tennessee reported 117 lake-type waterbodies in Tennessee in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status split on Tennessee's compact register

Every reported lake-type unit in this smaller Tennessee filing set falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. The bar partitions 117 units; cause and gauge panels below stay separate.

Most-listed impairment causes in Tennessee

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Mercury in Fish Tissue is the most-listed impairment cause in Tennessee, on 31 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
79 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Tennessee waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

Tennessee: 79% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.5× the national rate.

Reporting practice

Tennessee's definitive-verdict share, by the numbers

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

Tennessee holds the 39th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 117 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 65% of it. The counts above describe the 76 units carrying a verdict, not all 117 reported.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Illinois (63.5%) and Arizona (67.9%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Tennessee against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

65% 25th of 47 higher than 22 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in Tennessee

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Kentucky Reservoir Assessment unit TN06040005020_1000 Fully Supporting 99,500
2 Chickamauga Reservoir Fully Supporting 35,400
3 Watts Bar Reservoir Not Supporting 34,075
4 Douglas Reservoir Fully Supporting 30,400
5 Old Hickory Reservoir Fully Supporting 27,439
6 Cherokee Reservoir Not Supporting 25,964
7 Norris Reservoir Not Supporting 23,198
8 Center Hill Reservoir Not Supporting 23,051
9 Dale Hollow Reservoir Not Supporting 22,000
10 Kentucky Reservoir Assessment unit TN06040001001_1000 Fully Supporting 20,592
11 Barkley Reservoir Assessment unit TN05130205015_1000 Fully Supporting 20,459
12 Barkley Reservoir Assessment unit TN05130205015_2000 Fully Supporting 16,541

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in Tennessee

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by Tennessee.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Arrow Lake Not Supporting 7
2 Center Hill Reservoir Not Supporting 5
3 Blue Basin of Reelfoot Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Boone Reservoir Not Supporting 4
3 Buck Basin Not Supporting 4
3 City Lake Portland Not Supporting 4
3 Upper Blue Basin Not Supporting 4
3 Watauga Embayment of Boone Reservoir Not Supporting 4
3 West Sandy Embayment Not Supporting 4
10 Clinch River Arm of Watts Bar Reservoir Not Supporting 3

7 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 7 at 4 (rank 3). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Where Tennessee sits nationally on scale vs. impaired share

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. Tennessee falls below the sample floor for this comparison and is not plotted.

States near Tennessee's heavier not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside Tennessee. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; the neighborhoods below emphasize cross-state nearest neighbors when the not-supporting count is in the upper third.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (117 here).

Comparable not-supporting counts

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (60 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 65% of the inventory reported from Tennessee carries a definitive verdict, 25th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named Tennessee waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions Tennessee reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by Tennessee, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.