North Carolina reservoir · state assessment record

South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro)

Assessment decisions reported by N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality to EPA under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b), last assessed in the 2022 reporting cycle.

124
Assessed acres
Reservoir
Water type
View watchlist

This waterbody in one line

South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro), a reservoir in North Carolina, is assessed as not supporting one or more designated uses, with one listed impairment cause in the state's most recent Integrated Report cycle (2022). By assessed acreage it sits above the national median by assessed acreage (38,628 lakes); its impairment list is among the longest nationally (one listed cause vs 23,610 assessed lakes). Aquatic life is assessed as not supporting.

Not Supporting
overall status
P74
Assessed size nationally
P20
Shorter cause list
Not Supporting
aquatic life

Assessment verdicts are the state agency's decisions as reported to EPA ATTAINS; PlainLakes renders them without modification.

C+
Water Quality Standing
61/100
South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro)

A composite of this record's EPA ATTAINS designated-use verdicts, filed impairment count, and assessment currency, weighted and benchmarked against the national corpus of assessed active waterbodies. This is a water-quality standing, not a human-recreation or property-value judgment, and dimensions with no filed verdict drop out rather than count against the score.

RecreationN/A
Not assessed
Swimming, boating, and other primary/secondary contact recreation
Drinking WaterA+
Meeting criteria
Suitability as a public drinking-water source
Aquatic LifeF
Not supporting
Support for fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic organisms
Fish ConsumptionN/A
Not assessed
Safety of eating fish caught in this water
Impairment BurdenA+
1 cause
Filed pollutant/stressor causes, vs. the national corpus of assessed active units
Assessment CurrencyB+
2022
Reporting cycle this record’s verdicts were last decided in

Where South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) stands in the filed register

Paragraphs are selected by this unit's percentiles and use matrix: different lakes lead with different dimensions. Figures are ATTAINS / portal register arithmetic, not advice.

The signature stat: in-state cause rank

Inside North Carolina, this unit sits toward the short-list end: cause-list rank 73 of 92 indexed units.

Every ruled-on use is not supporting

On the uses this filer ruled on, aquatic life, every determination is Not Supporting. That is a use-by-use reading of the filed record, not a single overall lake grade.

South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro): Category 5, TMDL still owed

Category 5 is the Integrated Report band where a TMDL (or equivalent) is still expected for South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro). Read the listed causes and any cleanup actions filed beside them before treating the overall status tile as a finished restoration story.

Overall status: not supporting

The filer's overall status for South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) is Not Supporting. That tile summarizes the assessment unit; the designated-use rows and cause list are the evidence behind it.

Large assessed unit

At 124.3 acres, South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) clears the upper tercile of assessed lake-type units with an area on file (10,128 still larger). Size comparisons use the portal's deduplicated lake ranking population, not raw ATTAINS row counts.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, North Carolina carries 299 filed lake-type waterbodies in the August 2026 extract, and this page renders the assessment record EPA assigned to South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) without modification. See our methodology for reporting-unit limits and gauge linking rules.

Reporting cycle
2022
North Carolina Integrated Report
Listing category
Category 5
Uses with verdicts
2
Definitive use assessments
Sources retrieved
2026-08-17
Portal-wide ATTAINS + NWIS pull

The record

Designated-use assessments

Fully Supporting and Not Supporting are the state's definitive verdicts; other entries mean the use was not conclusively assessed in this cycle.

Designated use Group Verdict
Aquatic Life Aquatic-life or related Not Supporting
Water Supply Drinking-water supply designation Fully Supporting

The record

Listed impairment causes

Causes the state listed as impairing designated uses of this reservoir, with the cycle each was first listed and the Clean Water Act action recorded against it.

Cause Affected uses First listed Cleanup standing
Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support Aquatic Life 2012 TMDL priority: High

Reading the record

Cleanup queue for South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro)

1 listed cause ranked High in the TMDL queue, still without a plan

North Carolina ranked Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support high in its TMDL development queue, and no cleanup plan is on file for that listing yet. That queue rank is the state's own scheduling signal, not an EPA national rule.

A High ranking names a position in the state's plan-writing queue; it is not a measure of how impaired the water is. How listing and cleanup work.

Scale and rank

South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) is one of 299 lake-type waterbodies reported to EPA from North Carolina, and one of 92 whose reported record carries enough populated assessment or gauge data for this site to list and index it. At 124 assessed acres it ranks 10,129th by assessed size among the 38,628 lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, behind 10,128 lakes with a larger one.

Still unfiled

The state has not yet filed a definitive fish-consumption verdict and a definitive recreation verdict for this record; those fields populate when it reports them in a future Integrated Report cycle.

In context

Where South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) sits nationally

Assessed size among U.S. lakes

Distribution of assessed acreage across ATTAINS lakes filed with an area, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once

124 Top 26% larger than 74% of 38,628 lakes

lakes the dataset carries an area for, counting a state’s repeated filings of one water once, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Listed causes vs waterbodies carrying a verdict

How many impairment causes U.S. waterbodies with a reported verdict carry

1 Longer than most more listed causes than 49% of 23,610 waterbodies carrying a verdict

named waterbodies carrying a verdict, bucketed by value

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

In both charts each bar is a band and taller bars hold more waterbodies; the dashed line and filled bar mark South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro). Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share.

In context

North Carolina context

ATTAINS carries 299 lake-type waterbodies in North Carolina, 90 assessed as not supporting at least one use and 62 fully supporting. Among the 92 indexed units there, South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro) ranks 73rd by listed-cause count (one listed cause) and 70th by assessed size among the 91 with an area filed; it sits in the not-supporting set (90 statewide) . Its listed causes include Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support, which also appears among North Carolina's most-filed impairment causes (led by Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support).

Other large assessed lakes in North Carolina Assessed acres
CATAWBA RIVER (Lake Norman below elevation 760) Not Supporting 31,332
Phelps Lake Fully Supporting 15,938
Albemarle Sound Not Supporting 15,600
Nutbush Creek Arm of John H. Kerr Reservoir (below normal pool elevation 300 feet MSL or as this elevation may be adjusted by the Corps of Engineers) Fully Supporting 9,690
Lake Waccamaw Fully Supporting 8,840
ROANOKE RIVER (Lake Gaston below normal full power pool elevation 200 MSL) Fully Supporting 7,965

Peers near South Hyco Creek (Lake Roxboro)'s size or cause load

Similar assessed acres

Nearest filed extents (124 acres here).

Similar cause load

Nearest listed-cause counts (1 here). Peers already in the acreage column are omitted.

How peers are picked

What to do with this record

  • Assessment verdicts are cycle-based, not real-time. For fish-consumption decisions, your state advisory program is the binding source. Consumption status guide
  • Impairment listings follow the Clean Water Act 303(d) process; a listing is a regulatory finding, not a closure notice. 303(d) explained

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification. It does not issue advisories.

Assessment decisions on this page are rendered directly from state Integrated Report records in EPA's ATTAINS system; gauge figures are daily-value observations from the USGS National Water Information System, no number is typed in by an editor. Overall status, use verdicts, and causes are the state's reported decisions for assessment unit NC22-58-4-(1.4)a. Counts and percentiles are computed across all lake-type records PlainLakes ingests from ATTAINS. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.