Some of these decisions are EPA's. 2 of these 299 records carry a Clean Water Act cleanup plan EPA established rather than North Carolina. They are counted in every figure on this page, and each record page names which.

State water-quality picture · #29 by reported lake-type waterbodies

North Carolina lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions North Carolina reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 2014–2022), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

299
Reported waterbodies
90
Not supporting a use
28
Fish use not supporting
0
Gauged lakes

North Carolina in one line

299 lake-type waterbodies in North Carolina are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 2014–2022: 90 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 62 fully supporting, and 147 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support, on 57 waterbodies.

299
reported waterbodies
90
not supporting a use
62
fully supporting
59%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

North Carolina runs more USGS gauges than most states, but few are lake-linked

18 USGS gauges operate in North Carolina, the upper third of all states by raw instrument count — yet only 0 of the state's 299 lake-type units carry a gauge link. Most of that monitoring network serves rivers and streams, not this inventory.

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, North Carolina reported 299 lake-type waterbodies in North Carolina in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status mix on North Carolina's mid-size inventory

Every reported lake-type unit in North Carolina falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. This bar is the inventory partition; the cause chart and national gauge below answer different questions.

Most-listed impairment causes in North Carolina

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Chlorophyll-a - Aquatic Life Use Support is the most-listed impairment cause in North Carolina, on 57 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
59 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of North Carolina waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

North Carolina: 59% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.1× the national rate.

Reporting practice

North Carolina's definitive-verdict share, by the numbers

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

North Carolina holds the 29th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 299 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 50.8% of it. The counts above describe the 152 units carrying a verdict, not all 299 reported. North Carolina has also retired 17 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are North Dakota (51.8%) and Colorado (47.4%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

North Carolina against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

50.8% 33rd of 47 higher than 14 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in North Carolina

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 CATAWBA RIVER (Lake Norman below elevation 760) Not Supporting 31,332
2 Phelps Lake Fully Supporting 15,938
3 Albemarle Sound Not Supporting 15,600
4 Nutbush Creek Arm of John H. Kerr Reservoir (below normal pool elevation 300 feet MSL or as this elevation may be adjusted by the Corps of Engineers) Fully Supporting 9,690
5 Lake Waccamaw Fully Supporting 8,840
6 ROANOKE RIVER (Lake Gaston below normal full power pool elevation 200 MSL) Fully Supporting 7,965
7 YADKIN RIVER (including Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake) Assessment unit NC12-(124.5)c1 Fully Supporting 7,938
8 YADKIN RIVER (including Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake) Assessment unit NC12-(124.5)c2 Not Assessed 7,263
9 CATAWBA RIVER (Lake James below elevation 1200) Fully Supporting 5,811
10 LITTLE TENNESSEE RIVER (Fontana Lake below elevation 1708 MSL) Not Assessed 5,568
11 HIWASSEE RIVER (Hiwassee Lake below elevation 1525) Not Assessed 5,030
12 New Lake Not reported 4,981

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in North Carolina

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by North Carolina.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Haw River (B. Everett Jordan Lake below normal pool elevatio Assessment unit NC16-(37.5)a2 Not Supporting 6
1 Haw River (B. Everett Jordan Lake below normal pool elevatio Assessment unit NC16-(37.5)a1 Not Supporting 6
1 New Hope Creek (including New Hope Creek Arm of New Hope River Arm of B. Everett Jordan Lake) Not Supporting 6
4 Haw River (B. Everett Jordan Lake below normal pool elevatio Assessment unit NC16-(37.5)b Not Supporting 5
4 Morgan Creek (including the Morgan Creek Arm of New Hope River Arm of B. Everett Jordan Lake) Not Supporting 5
6 Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir) Assessment unit NC16-18-(1.5)b Not Supporting 4
7 Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir) Assessment unit NC16-18-(1.5)a1 Not Supporting 3
7 Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir) Assessment unit NC16-18-(1.5)a2b Not Supporting 3
7 Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir) Assessment unit NC16-18-(1.5)a2a Not Supporting 3
7 CATAWBA RIVER (Lake Wylie South FK Catawba Arm) North Carolina portion Not Supporting 3

9 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 3 at 6 (rank 1), 2 at 5 (rank 4), 4 at 3 (rank 7). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

North Carolina on the national scale-vs-impaired-share map

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%North CarolinaUtah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina (this record)15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. North Carolina is highlighted.

States with similar inventory scale or impairment load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside North Carolina. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; these neighborhoods are cross-state nearest neighbors on register size and not-supporting counts.

States with a similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (299 here).

Similar not-supporting load

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (90 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 50.8% of the inventory reported from North Carolina carries a definitive verdict, 33rd of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named North Carolina waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions North Carolina reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by North Carolina, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.