Some of these decisions are EPA's. 13 of these 304 records carry a Clean Water Act cleanup plan EPA established rather than Alabama. They are counted in every figure on this page, and each record page names which.

State water-quality picture · #28 by reported lake-type waterbodies

Alabama lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions Alabama reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 2006–2024), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

304
Reported waterbodies
143
Not supporting a use
131
Fish use not supporting
0
Gauged lakes

Alabama in one line

304 lake-type waterbodies in Alabama are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 2006–2024: 143 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 130 fully supporting, and 31 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Mercury, on 77 waterbodies.

304
reported waterbodies
143
not supporting a use
130
fully supporting
52%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

Alabama's mid-size register with a lighter not-supporting share

Alabama sits in the middle third by inventory size (304 units) and in the lowest third for ruled not-supporting share (52%).

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Alabama reported 304 lake-type waterbodies in Alabama in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status mix on Alabama's mid-size inventory

Every reported lake-type unit in Alabama falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. This bar is the inventory partition; the cause chart and national gauge below answer different questions.

Most-listed impairment causes in Alabama

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Mercury is the most-listed impairment cause in Alabama, on 77 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
52 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Alabama waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

Alabama: 52% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.0× below the national rate.

Reporting practice

Alabama's waterbodies mostly carry a definitive verdict

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

Alabama holds the 28th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 304 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 89.8% of it. The counts above describe the 273 units carrying a verdict, not all 304 reported. Alabama has also retired 12 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Maine (89.4%) and Kentucky (91.5%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Alabama against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

89.8% 12th of 47 higher than 35 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in Alabama

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Tennessee River (Lake Guntersville) Assessment unit AL06030001-0901-102 Fully Supporting 20,440
2 Wheeler Lake Assessment unit AL06030002-1107-103 Not Supporting 18,705
3 Tallapoosa River (Lake Martin) Fully Supporting 15,867
4 Coosa River (Weiss Lake) Not Supporting 15,066
5 Tennessee River (Wheeler Lake) Not Supporting 13,441
6 Tennessee River (Wilson Lake) Not Supporting 13,363
7 Coosa River (Logan Martin Lake) Not Supporting 10,945
8 Coosa River (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 10,559
9 Wheeler Lake Assessment unit AL06030002-1205-102 Not reported 10,438
10 Tennessee River (Lake Guntersville) Assessment unit AL06030001-0906-100 Fully Supporting 10,177
11 Chattahoochee River (Walter F. George Lake) Not Supporting 9,797
12 Pickwick Lake Fully Supporting 9,485

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in Alabama

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by Alabama.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Flint Creek (Wheeler Lake) Not Supporting 6
2 Kelly Creek (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 5
2 Talladega Creek (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 5
2 Tallaseehatchee Creek (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 5
5 Big Wills Creek (Neely Henry Lake) Not Supporting 4
5 Black Creek (Neely Henry Lake) Not Supporting 4
5 Coal Fire Creek (Aliceville Lake) Not Supporting 4
5 Coosa River (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 4
5 Dry Branch (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 4
5 Peckerwood Creek (Lay Lake) Not Supporting 4

9 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 3 at 5 (rank 2), 6 at 4 (rank 5). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Alabama on the national scale-vs-impaired-share map

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%AlabamaGeorgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama (this record)27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. Alabama is highlighted.

States near Alabama's lighter not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside Alabama. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; these neighborhoods highlight register-size and not-supporting peers while Alabama's ruled impairment share sits in the lowest third.

States with a similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (304 here).

Similar not-supporting load

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (143 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 89.8% of the inventory reported from Alabama carries a definitive verdict, 12th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named Alabama waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions Alabama reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by Alabama, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.