Some of these decisions are EPA's. 25 of these 1,431 records carry a Clean Water Act cleanup plan EPA established rather than Oregon. They are counted in every figure on this page, and each record page names which.

State water-quality picture · #8 by reported lake-type waterbodies

Oregon lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions Oregon reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 1998–2024), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

1,431
Reported waterbodies
165
Not supporting a use
90
Fish use not supporting
20
Gauged lakes

Oregon in one line

1,431 lake-type waterbodies in Oregon are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 1998–2024: 165 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 14 fully supporting, and 1,252 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Temperature, on 80 waterbodies.

1,431
reported waterbodies
165
not supporting a use
14
fully supporting
93%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles. 1 of those 14 fully supporting verdicts (7%) rest on designated uses this site does not report (irrigation, navigation and industrial water supply), with Oregon recording no verdict on fish consumption, recreation, aquatic life and drinking water. They are counted above because the state filed them, and excluded from the impaired share below because that figure compares states.

Oregon's large register still carries a heavy not-supporting share

Among the largest third of state lake-type registers (1,431 units), Oregon also sits in the upper third for ruled not-supporting share (93%). The size and the load move together here, not every large inventory does.

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Oregon reported 1,431 lake-type waterbodies in Oregon in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

How Oregon's large inventory splits across overall status

Each of the 1,431 lake-type units reported by Oregon lands in exactly one overall-status bucket. On a register this large, the bar is an inventory partition, the cause chart and national gauge below answer different questions.

Most-listed impairment causes in Oregon

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Temperature is the most-listed impairment cause in Oregon, on 80 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
93 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Oregon waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

Oregon: 93% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.8× the national rate.

Reporting practice

Oregon's inventory: still mostly without a definitive verdict

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

Oregon holds the 8th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 1,431 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 12.4% of it. The counts above describe the 178 units carrying a verdict, not all 1,431 reported. Oregon has also retired 4 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The state reporting at the nearest rate is Indiana (15.2%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Oregon against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

12.4% 47th of 47 the lowest of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in Oregon

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Goose Lake Not reported 93,152
2 Malheur Slough Not Supporting 73,544
3 Upper Klamath Lake Not Supporting 62,130
4 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_100320 Not Supporting 55,630
5 Lake Abert Not Assessed 44,751
6 Summer Lake Not reported 31,606
7 Harney Lake Not reported 31,369
8 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_107234 Not Supporting 15,437
9 Sutton Creek Not reported 15,017
10 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_100323 Not Supporting 14,845
11 <Null> Not reported 13,212
12 Brownlee Reservoir Not Supporting 12,530

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in Oregon

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by Oregon.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Brownlee Reservoir Not Supporting 10
2 Oxbow Reservoir Not Supporting 9
3 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_100323 Not Supporting 8
3 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_100320 Not Supporting 8
5 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1708000605_04_107234 Not Supporting 7
5 Upper Klamath Lake Not Supporting 7
7 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1707010106_88_100132 Not Supporting 6
7 Columbia River Assessment unit OR_LK_1707010504_88_100138 Not Supporting 6
7 Hells Canyon Reservoir Not Supporting 6
7 Lake Owyhee Not Supporting 6

8 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 2 at 8 (rank 3), 2 at 7 (rank 5), 4 at 6 (rank 7). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Gauge network

Lakes with a daily level record in Oregon

Lakes with a linked USGS gauge and a daily water-level record. Readings are daily-batch snapshots, not real-time.

Where Oregon sits nationally on scale vs. impaired share

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%OregonCalifornia · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon (this record)17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. Oregon is highlighted.

States near Oregon's heavier not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside Oregon. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; the neighborhoods below emphasize cross-state nearest neighbors when the not-supporting count is in the upper third.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (1,431 here).

Similar not-supporting load

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (165 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 12.4% of the inventory reported from Oregon carries a definitive verdict, 47th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named Oregon waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions Oregon reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by Oregon, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.