State water-quality picture · #21 by reported lake-type waterbodies

Oklahoma lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions Oklahoma and 7 tribal nations reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 1987–2025), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

456
Reported waterbodies
153
Not supporting a use
95
Fish use not supporting
5
Gauged lakes

Oklahoma in one line

456 lake-type waterbodies in Oklahoma are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 1987–2025: 153 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 45 fully supporting, and 258 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Mercury, on 87 waterbodies.

456
reported waterbodies
153
not supporting a use
45
fully supporting
78%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles. 3 of those 45 fully supporting verdicts (7%) rest on designated uses this site does not report (irrigation, navigation and industrial water supply), with Oklahoma recording no verdict on fish consumption, recreation, aquatic life and drinking water. They are counted above because the state filed them, and excluded from the impaired share below because that figure compares states.

Oklahoma's mid-size register with a heavier not-supporting share

Oklahoma sits in the middle third by inventory size (456 units) and in the upper third for ruled not-supporting share (78%).

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Oklahoma and 7 tribal nations reported 456 lake-type waterbodies in Oklahoma in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status mix on Oklahoma's mid-size inventory

Every reported lake-type unit in Oklahoma falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. This bar is the inventory partition; the cause chart and national gauge below answer different questions.

Most-listed impairment causes in Oklahoma

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Mercury is the most-listed impairment cause in Oklahoma, on 87 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
78 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Oklahoma waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

Oklahoma: 78% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.5× the national rate.

Reporting practice

How much of the Oklahoma inventory carries a definitive verdict

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

Oklahoma holds the 21st-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 456 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 42.8% of it. The counts above describe the 195 units carrying a verdict, not all 456 reported. Oklahoma has also retired 4 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Missouri (42.9%) and New Mexico (42%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Not every unit counted here was assessed by Oklahoma. 28 of them were filed by 7 sovereign tribal nations reporting directly to EPA under Clean Water Act section 518, which lets a tribe set and apply its own water quality standards in the same manner as a state: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (12), Cherokee Nation (4), Seneca-Cayuga Nation (4), Chickasaw Nation (3), Citizen Potawatomi Nation (3), Caddo Nation of Oklahoma (1), Sac & Fox Nation (1). Those decisions are theirs, not Oklahoma's.

Oklahoma against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

42.8% 37th of 47 higher than 10 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in Oklahoma

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Grand Lake Site 12 Not Supporting 46,500
1 Grand Lake Site 13 Not Supporting 46,500
1 Grand Lake Site 14 Fully Supporting 46,500
1 Grand Lake Site 15 Fully Supporting 46,500
5 Robert S. Kerr Lake Not Supporting 43,380
6 Texoma Lake, Red River Arm, Lower Not Supporting 31,081
7 Oologah Lake Not Supporting 29,460
8 Eufaula Lake, Gaines Creek Arm Not Supporting 24,990
9 Eufaula Lake, N. Canadian River Arm Not Supporting 20,680
10 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, Middle Not Supporting 19,584
11 Texoma Lake, Washita River Arm, Lower Not Supporting 19,214
12 Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Arm Not Supporting 19,040

4 of the 12 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 4 at 46,500 (rank 1). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in Oklahoma

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by Oklahoma and by 7 tribal nations.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Coalgate Municipal Lake Not Supporting 5
1 Wister Lake Not Supporting 5
3 Atoka Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Broken Bow Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Heyburn Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Holdenville Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Pine Creek Lake Not Supporting 4
3 Thunderbird Lake Not Supporting 4
9 Arbuckle Lake (Lake of the Arbuckles) Not Supporting 3
9 Birch Lake Not Supporting 3

Every row in this table ties with at least one other on the ranked value: 2 at 5 (rank 1), 6 at 4 (rank 3), 2 at 3 (rank 9). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Gauge network

Lakes with a daily level record in Oklahoma

Lakes with a linked USGS gauge and a daily water-level record. Readings are daily-batch snapshots, not real-time.

Oklahoma's register size against its impaired share, nationally

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%OklahomaVirginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma (this record)19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. Oklahoma is highlighted.

States near Oklahoma's heavier not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside Oklahoma. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; the neighborhoods below emphasize cross-state nearest neighbors when the not-supporting count is in the upper third.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (456 here).

Comparable not-supporting counts

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (153 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 42.8% of the inventory reported from Oklahoma carries a definitive verdict, 37th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named Oklahoma waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions Oklahoma and 7 tribal nations reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by Oklahoma and by 7 tribal nations, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.