State water-quality picture · #32 by reported lake-type waterbodies

South Dakota lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions South Dakota reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 2012–2026), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

195
Reported waterbodies
145
Not supporting a use
Not reported
Fish use assessments
1
Gauged lake

South Dakota in one line

195 lake-type waterbodies in South Dakota are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 2012–2026: 145 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 41 fully supporting, and 9 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Mercury in Fish Tissue, on 75 waterbodies.

195
reported waterbodies
145
not supporting a use
41
fully supporting
78%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

South Dakota's mid-size register with a heavier not-supporting share

South Dakota sits in the middle third by inventory size (195 units) and in the upper third for ruled not-supporting share (78%).

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, South Dakota reported 195 lake-type waterbodies in South Dakota in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status mix on South Dakota's mid-size inventory

Every reported lake-type unit in South Dakota falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. This bar is the inventory partition; the cause chart and national gauge below answer different questions.

Most-listed impairment causes in South Dakota

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Mercury in Fish Tissue is the most-listed impairment cause in South Dakota, on 75 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
78 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of South Dakota waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

South Dakota: 78% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.5× the national rate.

Reporting practice

A definitive verdict covers nearly all of South Dakota's inventory

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

South Dakota holds the 32nd-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 195 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 95.4% of it. The counts above describe the 186 units carrying a verdict, not all 195 reported. South Dakota has also retired 3 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Georgia (95.2%) and Kansas (96.3%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

South Dakota against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

95.4% 8th of 47 higher than 39 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in South Dakota

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Lake Thompson Not Supporting 13,888
2 Lake Poinsett Not Supporting 9,795
3 Waubay Lake Not Supporting 9,531
4 Bitter Lake Not Supporting 7,865
5 Dry Lake Number 2 Not Supporting 6,442
6 Orman Dam (Belle Fourche Reservoir) Not Supporting 6,106
7 Big Stone Lake Fully Supporting 5,800
8 Shadehill Reservoir Not Supporting 5,160
9 Lake Traverse Fully Supporting 5,082
10 Lake Kampeska Fully Supporting 5,067
11 Lake Andes Not Supporting 4,756
12 Angostura Reservoir Fully Supporting 4,753

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in South Dakota

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by South Dakota.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Freeman Lake Not Supporting 6
2 Lake Alvin Not Supporting 4
2 Lake Faulkton Not Supporting 4
2 Ravine Lake Not Supporting 4
2 Summit Lake Not Supporting 4
6 BearButte Lake Not Supporting 3
6 Beaver Lake Not Supporting 3
6 Burke Lake Not Supporting 3
6 Clear Lake Not Supporting 3
6 Cresbard Lake Not Supporting 3

9 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 4 at 4 (rank 2), 5 at 3 (rank 6). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Gauge network

Lakes with a daily level record in South Dakota

Lakes with a linked USGS gauge and a daily water-level record. Readings are daily-batch snapshots, not real-time.

South Dakota's register size against its impaired share, nationally

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%South DakotaKansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota (this record)18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. South Dakota is highlighted.

States near South Dakota's heavier not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside South Dakota. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; the neighborhoods below emphasize cross-state nearest neighbors when the not-supporting count is in the upper third.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (195 here).

Comparable not-supporting counts

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (145 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 95.4% of the inventory reported from South Dakota carries a definitive verdict, 8th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named South Dakota waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions South Dakota reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by South Dakota, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.