State water-quality picture · #34 by reported lake-type waterbodies

New Mexico lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions New Mexico and the Pueblo of San Ildefonso reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 1998–2026), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

176
Reported waterbodies
46
Not supporting a use
Not reported
Fish use assessments
6
Gauged lakes

New Mexico in one line

176 lake-type waterbodies in New Mexico are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 1998–2026: 46 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 28 fully supporting, and 102 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Nutrients, on 25 waterbodies.

176
reported waterbodies
46
not supporting a use
28
fully supporting
62%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

New Mexico's smaller reported lake-type inventory

At 176 units, New Mexico is in the lowest third of state lake-type registers. The charts below describe that compact filing set, not a national-scale inventory.

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, New Mexico and the Pueblo of San Ildefonso reported 176 lake-type waterbodies in New Mexico in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status split on New Mexico's compact register

Every reported lake-type unit in this smaller New Mexico filing set falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. The bar partitions 176 units; cause and gauge panels below stay separate.

Most-listed impairment causes in New Mexico

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Nutrients is the most-listed impairment cause in New Mexico, on 25 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
62 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of New Mexico waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

New Mexico: 62% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, 1.2× the national rate.

Reporting practice

Where New Mexico stands on definitive-verdict coverage

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

New Mexico holds the 34th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 176 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 42% of it. The counts above describe the 74 units carrying a verdict, not all 176 reported. New Mexico has also retired 25 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Oklahoma (42.8%) and Idaho (37.6%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Not every unit counted here was assessed by New Mexico. 3 of them were filed by a sovereign tribal nation reporting directly to EPA under Clean Water Act section 518, which lets a tribe set and apply its own water quality standards in the same manner as a state: Pueblo of San Ildefonso (3). Those decisions are theirs, not New Mexico's.

New Mexico against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

42% 38th of 47 higher than 9 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in New Mexico

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Navajo Reservoir Not Supporting 12,680
2 Elephant Butte Reservoir Not Supporting 10,909
3 South Lordsburg Playa Not Assessed 7,412
4 Ute Reservoir Not Supporting 5,988
5 Heron Reservoir Not Supporting 4,497
6 Laguna del Pero Fully Supporting 4,477
7 Caballo Reservoir Not Supporting 4,441
8 Conchas Reservoir Not Supporting 3,411
9 Lake Lucero (North) Not Assessed 3,326
10 Abiquiu Reservoir Not Supporting 3,258
11 El Vado Reservoir Fully Supporting 3,108
12 North Lordsburg Playa Not Assessed 3,016

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in New Mexico

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by New Mexico and by the Pueblo of San Ildefonso.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Abiquiu Reservoir Not Supporting 3
1 Bear Canyon Reservoir Not Supporting 3
1 Heron Reservoir Not Supporting 3
1 Lake Roberts Not Supporting 3
1 Santa Cruz Lake Not Supporting 3
1 Snow Lake Not Supporting 3
1 Storrie Lake Not Supporting 3
8 Bill Evans Lake Not Supporting 2
8 Bluewater Lake Not Supporting 2
8 Brantley Reservoir Not Supporting 2

Every row in this table ties with at least one other on the ranked value: 7 at 3 (rank 1), 3 at 2 (rank 8). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Gauge network

Lakes with a daily level record in New Mexico

Lakes with a linked USGS gauge and a daily water-level record. Readings are daily-batch snapshots, not real-time.

New Mexico's register size against its impaired share, nationally

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%Alabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. New Mexico falls below the sample floor for this comparison and is not plotted.

States with similar inventory scale or impairment load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside New Mexico. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; these neighborhoods are cross-state nearest neighbors on register size and not-supporting counts.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (176 here).

Comparable not-supporting counts

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (46 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 42% of the inventory reported from New Mexico carries a definitive verdict, 38th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named New Mexico waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions New Mexico and the Pueblo of San Ildefonso reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by New Mexico and by the Pueblo of San Ildefonso, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.