Some of these decisions are EPA's. 48 of these 144 records carry a Clean Water Act cleanup plan EPA established rather than Arkansas. They are counted in every figure on this page, and each record page names which.

State water-quality picture · #35 by reported lake-type waterbodies

Arkansas lakes and reservoirs

Every figure on this page is computed from the assessment decisions Arkansas reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Clean Water Act sections 303(d) and 305(b) (reporting cycles 1992–2024), plus daily water-level observations from the U.S. Geological Survey.

144
Reported waterbodies
62
Not supporting a use
42
Fish use not supporting
0
Gauged lakes

Arkansas in one line

144 lake-type waterbodies in Arkansas are reported to EPA ATTAINS across reporting cycles 1992–2024: 62 assessed as not supporting at least one designated use, 55 fully supporting, and 27 without a definitive overall verdict. The most-listed impairment cause is Mercury in Fish Tissue, on 45 waterbodies.

144
reported waterbodies
62
not supporting a use
55
fully supporting
53%
of definitive verdicts impaired

An unassessed waterbody is neither confirmed clean nor confirmed impaired; states assess on multi-year cycles.

Arkansas's smaller reported lake-type inventory

At 144 units, Arkansas is in the lowest third of state lake-type registers. The charts below describe that compact filing set, not a national-scale inventory.

Data updated 2026-08-17

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ATTAINS program, Arkansas reported 144 lake-type waterbodies in Arkansas in the August 2026 extract. See our methodology for filer attribution and multi-year reporting cycles.

Overall-status split on Arkansas's compact register

Every reported lake-type unit in this smaller Arkansas filing set falls into exactly one overall-status bucket. The bar partitions 144 units; cause and gauge panels below stay separate.

Most-listed impairment causes in Arkansas

Waterbodies carrying each listed cause, most first

waterbodies

What this shows Mercury in Fish Tissue is the most-listed impairment cause in Arkansas, on 45 of the lake-type waterbodies reported there.

Source EPA ATTAINS As of Reporting cycles 1987–2026
53 N

Computed share from EPA ATTAINS filed records, not an official EPA rating or safety grade.

Share of Arkansas waterbodies with a verdict on fish, recreation, aquatic life or drinking water assessed as not supporting a use

Arkansas: 53% of ruled verdicts are not-supporting, against a national share of 53%, in line with the national rate.

Reporting practice

A definitive verdict covers nearly all of Arkansas's inventory

Each reporting authority decides how much of the water it files to EPA it actually assesses in a cycle. That decision sets the denominator behind every count on this page.

Arkansas holds the 35th-largest reported lake-type inventory in the country, 144 assessment units, carrying a definitive verdict on 81.3% of it. The counts above describe the 117 units carrying a verdict, not all 144 reported. Arkansas has also retired 28 lake-type assessment units, superseded filings that are kept on the site but not counted here.

The states reporting at the nearest rates are Maryland (79.4%) and Virginia (84%).

Assessing more of an inventory is a reporting choice, set by cycle length, monitoring budget and how finely a state splits its waters into units. It is not a measure of water quality, and it is why a raw count from one state does not sit beside a raw count from another. How assessment coverage varies.

Arkansas against every comparable state

Share of reported lake-type waterbodies carrying a definitive verdict

81.3% 18th of 47 higher than 29 of 47 states

the 47 comparable states, by definitive-verdict share

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycles 1987–2026

Each bar counts states whose definitive-verdict share falls in that 10-point band. The 47 states shown are those reporting at least 25 lake-type units; a share off a smaller inventory is precision the data does not have.

By size

Largest assessed lakes in Arkansas

By assessed acreage as reported in ATTAINS. Acreage is the assessed unit's size, which can differ from a lake's full surface area.

# Waterbody Assessed acres
1 Dardanelle Lake Fully Supporting 34,041
2 Millwood Lake Assessment unit AR_11140109_4020 Fully Supporting 29,500
3 Ouachita Lake Fully Supporting 24,695
4 Bull Shoals Assessment unit AR_11010003_4011 Not Supporting 22,046
5 Greers Ferry Lake Assessment unit AR_11010014_4021 Fully Supporting 18,151
6 Felsenthal Lake Not Supporting 14,000
7 Norfork Lake Not Supporting 13,833
8 Beaver Lake Fully Supporting 13,546
9 Greers Ferry Lake Assessment unit AR_11010014_4020 Fully Supporting 12,883
10 Bull Shoals Assessment unit AR_11010003_4010 Not Supporting 11,498
11 Millwood Lake Assessment unit AR_11140109_4021 Fully Supporting 10,344
12 De Gray Lake Fully Supporting 9,299

By cause count

Most-listed waterbodies in Arkansas

Waterbodies carrying the most listed impairment causes among the lake-type units reported by Arkansas.

# Waterbody Listed causes
1 Cox Creek Lake Not Supporting 3
2 Horseshoe Lake Not Supporting 2
2 Lake Frierson Not Supporting 2
2 Nimrod Lake Not Supporting 2
2 Pickthorne Lake Not Supporting 2
2 Winona Lake Assessment unit AR_08040203_4100 Not Supporting 2
2 Winona Lake Assessment unit AR_08040203_4101 Not Supporting 2
8 Bear Creek Lake Not Supporting 1
8 Beaver Lake Assessment unit AR_11010001_4042 Not Supporting 1
8 Beaver Lake Assessment unit AR_11010001_4041 Not Supporting 1

9 of the 10 rows in this table tie on the ranked value: 6 at 2 (rank 2), 3 at 1 (rank 8). Tied rows share a rank and are listed in no meaningful order; where a tie reaches the top the medal is shared, because nothing separates those rows.

Arkansas's register size against its impaired share, nationally

Assessed-corpus size does not predict impaired share: a state with a large register can still post a low not-supporting rate, and a small register can post a high one.

Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 36 entities by Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) (X) and Impaired share (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large corpus, high shareSmall corpus, high shareLarge corpus, low shareSmall corpus, low share 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Definitive verdicts (assessed corpus) Impaired share (%) New Hampshire · 2,783, 100%Washington · 393, 100%New Jersey · 604, 96.5%Massachusetts · 718, 94.4%Oregon · 178, 92.7%California · 224, 90.2%New York · 642, 87.7%Illinois · 497, 87.3%Rhode Island · 140, 85%Oklahoma · 195, 78.5%Virginia · 231, 78.4%South Dakota · 186, 78%Kansas · 316, 76.3%Iowa · 203, 67.5%Florida · 1,003, 63.4%Nebraska · 352, 62.2%Indiana · 241, 60.2%North Carolina · 152, 59.2%Utah · 134, 57.5%Missouri · 267, 56.6%Kentucky · 129, 55.8%Colorado · 163, 54.6%Minnesota · 3,364, 53.4%Arkansas · 117, 53%ArkansasAlabama · 273, 52.4%Georgia · 119, 39.5%South Carolina · 540, 39.3%Michigan · 2,339, 34.5%Connecticut · 139, 31.7%North Dakota · 176, 29.5%Texas · 433, 28.9%Pennsylvania · 516, 26.2%Vermont · 712, 21.6%Idaho · 237, 21.5%Wisconsin · 4,718, 10.4%Maine · 303, 10.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor
NameDefinitive verdicts (assessed corpus)Impaired share (%)
New Hampshire2,783100%
Washington393100%
New Jersey60496.5%
Massachusetts71894.4%
Oregon17892.7%
California22490.2%
New York64287.7%
Illinois49787.3%
Rhode Island14085%
Oklahoma19578.5%
Virginia23178.4%
South Dakota18678%
Kansas31676.3%
Iowa20367.5%
Florida1,00363.4%
Nebraska35262.2%
Indiana24160.2%
North Carolina15259.2%
Utah13457.5%
Missouri26756.6%
Kentucky12955.8%
Colorado16354.6%
Minnesota3,36453.4%
Arkansas (this record)11753%
Alabama27352.4%
Georgia11939.5%
South Carolina54039.3%
Michigan2,33934.5%
Connecticut13931.7%
North Dakota17629.5%
Texas43328.9%
Pennsylvania51626.2%
Vermont71221.6%
Idaho23721.5%
Wisconsin4,71810.4%
Maine30310.2%
Source: EPA ATTAINS, states above the sample floor

The crosshair sits at the median across the 36 qualifying states on each axis, not the range midpoint, so it splits the group evenly. Arkansas is highlighted.

States near Arkansas's lighter not-supporting load

Two EPA ATTAINS peer sets outside Arkansas. The reporting-practice chart above stays on definitive-verdict share; these neighborhoods highlight register-size and not-supporting peers while Arkansas's ruled impairment share sits in the lowest third.

Similar reported inventory

Nearest states by lake-type units on the register (144 here).

Comparable not-supporting counts

Nearest states by units assessed not supporting a use (62 here). Inventory peers above are omitted.

Peers are nearest-neighbor matches on EPA ATTAINS register size and not-supporting counts among states with at least 25 reported units. Impairment peers skip states already listed in the inventory column so the two link sets stay distinct.

Using this state picture

  • Comparisons across states hold on shares, not counts: 81.3% of the inventory reported from Arkansas carries a definitive verdict, 18th of 47 comparable states. National rankings
  • Fish-consumption verdicts here are assessment decisions. Species-level meal advice comes from the state fish-advisory program. Consumption guide
  • Browse every named Arkansas waterbody with a populated record. Browse waterbodies

PlainLakes renders state assessment decisions and federal gauge observations without modification.

Figures on this page are computed from the assessment decisions Arkansas reported to EPA's ATTAINS system and from USGS National Water Information System daily values, no number is typed in by an editor. State counts aggregate every lake-type assessment unit reported by Arkansas, including unnamed units that never receive their own page. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-17. Primary sources: EPA ATTAINS and USGS National Water Information System.